"When will there be enough women on the Supreme Court? When there are nine."
I love this quote. It trashes the notion of equality that they pretend to care about and openly states the true desire for complete domination.
Barrett will always be a mistake. The answer to the RBG empty seat should have been someone who made my views of women look moderate. That would be the equivalent to what she was.
This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men. And only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem, revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic preference for their own gender.
"When will there be enough women on the Supreme Court? When there are nine."
I love this quote. It trashes the notion of equality that they pretend to care about and openly states the true desire for complete domination.
Barrett will always be a mistake. The answer to the RBG empty seat should have been someone who made my views of women look moderate. That would be the equivalent to what she was.
Forget that, their in-group bias disqualifies them without resorting to stereotypes that they will whine about.
To be fair, everyone has some degree of in-group bias.
But statistically, women have 4.5 times more in-group bias than men. In fact, men have almost no in-group bias:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect