-1
MaverickBoobies -1 points ago +4 / -5

A lot. Because it was the beyond the range of the Ukrainian HIMARS and other precision artillery strikes and missiles. Now they will have to go through land, which will expose them even more to Ukrainian weapons. This is why people in Crimea were rushing to buy fuel.

-1
MaverickBoobies -1 points ago +3 / -4

I will agree with you that the HIMARS pothole-maker hyping was very cringe.

If you destroy the basic structure of the bridge, that keeps it holding together, no APCs, tanks, trucks or anything heavy will be able to go through without collapsing the bridge. You could, depending on the damage, maybe use a car. But it will be mostly left to pedestrians.

This is why the Kerch bridge is only allowing cars right now, despite Russia saying its damage was insignificant. Trucks will need to use the old method they used to before, by barges.

-8
MaverickBoobies -8 points ago +8 / -16

You are absolutely correct.

That bridge was a military target, because it supplied the entire Russian army in the south. Unlike some random pedestrian bridge, a random car on the street, or a random German consulate in Kiev.

It also shows Russia has ran out of precision strike missiles and are using dumb missiles. The sanctions and the war is taking its toll.

It is fascinating to see how the pro-Russia crowd is celebrating the destruction of a pedestrian bridge with no military benefit. It smells like a massive cope to me for the pro-Russian shills.

-1
MaverickBoobies -1 points ago +1 / -2

Projecting now? Is this you trying to tell me that you are now coping over the fact Russian can't even afford the basics for their soldiers?

-1
MaverickBoobies -1 points ago +1 / -2

Are you deflecting or did I just break your NPC programming? What you just said makes no sense whatsoever as an answer to my arguments.

-1
MaverickBoobies -1 points ago +1 / -2

They used for different reasons. So, those Russian soldiers identify themselves as women?

I think you don't understand how wars work.

1
MaverickBoobies 1 point ago +4 / -3
  • Checks if I am on reddit r/news and people blaming something on whites *

  • Kotakuinaction2 community on .win *

Oh... never mind. Can't blame me for confusing both. Carry on.

-8
MaverickBoobies -8 points ago +1 / -9

Didn't they just admit that it is about conquering Transnistria and got owned by an Italian Tv presenter?

That does explain why they rode to Ukraine with tanks praising Stalin and the Soviet flag though, right?

-1
MaverickBoobies -1 points ago +1 / -2

Aren't you the one who thought that blindfolding war prisoners was useless?

Once again, did Americans give American soldiers pads?

-12
MaverickBoobies -12 points ago +1 / -13

Same Russia. Putin even wants it back, check his speech on how he regrets the dissolution of the soviet union.

19
MaverickBoobies 19 points ago +19 / -0

I guess they are finally capitalizing on the stuff they pulled during the cold war. (Yuri Bezmenov)

-1
MaverickBoobies -1 points ago +1 / -2

Does America give that as default to American soldiers, or only countries who have no resources and can't afford proper items?

8
MaverickBoobies 8 points ago +8 / -0

You missed the opportunity to say "I want to speak with the man in charge". lol

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›