-
Putin was holding back the entire time
-
the only rational explanation for his restraint was that he wanted to minimize civilian casualties and damage to critical infrastructure
-
this desire to minimize collateral damage makes Putin a better man than all of the Western commanders who indiscriminately carpet bombed their enemies in virtually every major conflict since WW2
-
at this point, if Western media are speaking, they’re lying
-
everyone on this board who thought the Ukraine was winning this war, or that Russia was somehow outmatched, is a fucking retard
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (101)
sorted by:
If you destroy the basic structure of the bridge, that keeps it holding together, no APCs, tanks, trucks or anything heavy will be able to go through without collapsing the bridge. You could, depending on the damage, maybe use a car. But it will be mostly left to pedestrians.
This is why the Kerch bridge is only allowing cars right now, despite Russia saying its damage was insignificant. Trucks will need to use the old method they used to before, by barges.
Just how much military stuff was Russia transporting over the bridge to begin with? Especially now that they have a land-bridge to Crimea. Seems like a shorter route.
The attack seems to be mostly about propaganda.
The Kerch bridge has a railway system, which is always more cost-effective than shipping goods by means of trucks. And the Russian military machine is heavily reliant on railway systems across the Russian expanse.
A lot. Because it was the beyond the range of the Ukrainian HIMARS and other precision artillery strikes and missiles. Now they will have to go through land, which will expose them even more to Ukrainian weapons. This is why people in Crimea were rushing to buy fuel.