That's not a bad way to go about it. I just worry we wouldn't have enough people here to make it more tournament style instead of just s social club, though I guess that's just fine for now too.
The hardest part would be setting up for the team games like CS:GO or DotA.
RTS' and arcade fighters are usually the easiest, though I'm not sure how many play them here. It kinda feels like the userbase skews more towards single player games.
Sure, let's do it.
You're again ignoring my argument and setting up your own strawman.
Read it again.
It WILL be used against you.
It doesn't matter what you think the left will do.
You will concede more and more ground to assuage your ego thinking you struck some kind of blow when in reality all you did was to help tighten the noose around your neck.
Okay wise guy.
What's the difference between a murder and a drawing of a murder?
I don't see it.
The globalist cabal have had the same plan since WWI.
Their speech and stated ideals might change but they've always been working towards a single goal.
I suspect she never lost favor at all but was being set up as controlled opposition.
I'm not a libertarian, nor is my argument libertarian.
What I'm telling you is that it doesn't matter what your moral argument is. Left or right doesn't matter.
It WILL be used against you.
You are doing nothing but giving a loaded gun to people who hate you, but you think it's good because you win some tiny and irrelevant personal moral victory.
Doesn't matter at all.
Child porn is still illegal and by good arguement.
The issue is of censorship of drawings and writings.
What pedos do with them doesn't matter as long as they aren't abusing children, which again is still a crime.
Doesn't seem off to me at all.
Power hungry woman turns heel at a moment's notice for more personal power and influence.
The Israeli government certainly doesn't hate him.
It's just very convenient to put on a couple different masks and swap them out between scenes.
Which is why instead go the opposite way and say, "No we will not ban it."
What you're doing is ceding ground and letting them take over more and more rooms in your house, and justifying it by saying, "Well they like certain drawings so I'm glad they got shot."
You're completely ignoring the fact that leftists gain ground and you lose ground. You get DnC'd and applaud it.
Would be pretty nice if we could get TD and the other boards in to create a decent sized gaming event.
Friendly competitive gaming is a great way to build bridges and creating lasting relationships.
Arrested for possession of child porn FILMED ON HIS PROPERTY.
Released without bail back to said property and his two adopted children.
There is no rule of law anymore.
Copied from the other thread:
I said this way back on reddit when alternative sites are being discussed:
Loli is the canary in the coal mine.
It's perfectly legal content.
When it gets banned specifically it means that the site admins have begun ramping up ideological censorship and it will only grow and take over more concepts.
Whatever you may think about about loli doesn't matter. What matters are the arguments used to nix it, and those arguments in favor universally give site admins grounds to expand censorship beyond simple pornographic or lewd content, unless ALL pornography is banned as a base.
What you need to take away from this is that censorship on minds will snowball from here. It already was not a place for free discussions. Now that will get worse.
÷
Just look at the UK and how far their expansion of suppression of speech is going, and remember that it all started with the labeling of certain kinds of porn as illegal because it was "in poor taste." Now if you misgender a tranny you're scum that needs to be in jail, and the national firewall to rival China's is almost ready.
It's a projection of shame.
They know they're guilty and attempt to pass that guilt off onto others.
If you had said child molesters I'd agree with the condition that they are simply shot.
Instead you've created an extrinsic factor and entangled wrongthink and "the worst of crimes" into fictional, drawn images.
What you're doing is creating a broken standard the same as leftists who say that those who misgender trannies should go to jail or die.
You're setting up a precedent that will be used against you.
I said this both back on reddit and my other post here:
You and others are completely ignoring the evolution of the arguments against loli.
Those arguments and standings WILL BE and HAVE BEEN used to attack other content and speech.
Just look at the UK and their government's attempts to create a national firewall to ban content and track people who call trannies ugly. It all started with porn.
When you allow moral busybodies to start banning stuff for a glorified "I don't like that" argument don't be surprised when more and more gets banned.
And if you let "lolicon" get banned for arbitrary reasons you just let a censorious mob get their foot in the door and gave them a platform to launch valid attacks on other targets.
A full porn ban is a good and defensible position.
A pick-and-choose system of saying this, that, and the other are ideologically unacceptable creates a foundation for the expansion of censorship. There will always be those who take offense to some kind of content and banning content purely on the grounds of "it's disgusting" will give them greater power to act.
Look at Australia and the UK. They've gradually expanded their arbitrary banning of pornographic content to the point of using it to create full nation level censorship legislation for expanded content.
You are tricked into thinking you're doing good but in reality you're unwittingly doing your enemy's work for them.
We defend loli content alongside all drawn content because to do otherwise means that we've established a baseline for ideological censorship of speech.
It's you guys who are so set in with emotional baggage that you don't realize you're being baited into laying the foundation for ideological suppression of other content and speech.
illustrated terrorist activities
illustrated hate speech
illustrated rape
I don't think you understand in any capacity where your argument leads nor what it will be used for.
Then you've established that you're willing to censor information for ideological reasons and will soon come to ban speech.
You either ban all porn, or you allow drawn images like loli, gore, and bestiality.
Has nothing to do with pedophilia or liking the images themselves. It's a litmus test for ideological censorship. If you ban loli on ideological grounds saying that you don't like it, you and others involved in the site will expand that reasoning to other topics. It's a very slippery slope.
Okay, then try and make that argument.
Write it out.
Explain how the allowance of a drawn image "opens the door" to something worse.
I said this way back on reddit when alternative sites are being discussed:
Loli is the canary in the coal mine.
It's perfectly legal content.
When it gets banned specifically it means that the site admins have begun ramping up ideological censorship and it will only grow and take over more concepts.
Whatever you may think about about loli doesn't matter. What matters are the arguments used to nix it, and those arguments in favor universally give site admins grounds to expand censorship beyond simple pornographic or lewd content, unless ALL pornography is banned as a base.
What you need to take away from this is that censorship on minds will snowball from here. It already was not a place for free discussions. Now that will get worse.
Less standing than Joe Biden on stairs.
What moral preening?
The "right" establishment gives up ground constantly. Both the GOP and the Libertarian party are openly courting faggots and trannies.
The issue isn't that it's done nothing, but that it isn't being used. Only a few sparse individuals still make the argument while those in power do their best to undermine them.
I honestly don't care at all what the left is doing. They're always going to push degenerate nonsense.
Until the right actually takes a stand we'll just keep moving left.