I'm not without sympathy for the family
I am. What they did is an act of war.
For someone who claims to be so smart
I'll remind you that you were bragging about your alleged IQ like a Rick and Morty Watcher and even doing the equivalent of challenging people to a fight online.
you sure have trouble understanding things that have been explained to you over and over again
I do have trouble 'understanding things' that aren't true and don't make sense, and that unfortunately covers a lot of things that you believe.
Now go fuck yourself. I'm done wasting my time on your dumbass.
Confirming what I said about the nature of that offer to "compare college transcripts". You're like the 13 year old kid saying he'll fight someone at any time, any place.
lol, that wasn't the 'figuring out' I was referring to. Incredible that you're still not... figuring it out.
If you don't mind, I'm leaving your crazy professional victimhood behind.
Over time it would. Not immediately, obviously.
"Soon enough".
Not at all. The idea is to get non-White women to produce as little babies as possible in hopes of getting the birth rates down of non-White women to below sustainable birth rates. The best way to accomplish that is to make the women richer than the men and in school during their most fertile years. Turn their women into laborers instead of breeders. We have tons of data to support that this drops birth rates down significantly. Comparatively speaking, we do the opposite to White women in order to promote the birth rates.
And no one will figure it out.
Don't take this the wrong way, for someone with such anti-human opinions you seem surprisingly pleasant, but it seems your autism got the better of you when thinking up this scheme.
Even if you got all that, it certainly wouldn't make non-whites "dwindle into nothingness". Quite apart from the weird white men and non-white women. You think non-white women are less not white?
Well yeah, I'm calling you what you are. And pointing out that people who are actually smart, don't go around bragging about it on the internet. I guess even you must realize that, as you're working hard to avoid that subject.
You're a Marco Rubio lover. So yeah, you love neocons, Mr. Rick and Morty watcher.
Is this malicious prosecution?
Do you think yourself superior because you've decided not to find any commonality among the people you have problems with
There's plenty of commonalities. Just not ones that Nazis tend to like.
wouldn't it make sense to reduce the population of the race with the highest prevalence of crime in order to reduce crime
Gas them?
the objective was to reduce crime and not feel good about one's value-system, my view would be superior to yours.
The objective is not to murder people en masse, which is something you seem to have difficulty with.
I understand my premise relies on the presumption that race is a factor in crime
Not much of a presumption. As it stands, it is a factor. The fact that some people blame other factors, does not lessen race itself as a factor, as those other factors are heavily correlated with race.
You can argue both cases haven't been done and that the only reason race is a factor in crime is due to other factors that still need to be maximized like socioeconomic status
SES, as well as 'racism', can easily be dismissed as a cause for violence or riots. Blacks were way poorer in the 1950s, and yet there were far fewer race riots and much less crime among blacks.
This mere fact also shows that at least some non-race factors exist. The blackness of blacks did not change since the 1950s, but as a group the criminality has vastly increased.
why would you presume two humans that share similar genetics by way of identification through race would not also have similar behaviors on average to each other moreso than say two humans of different genetics by way of identification through differing races?
You're making all sorts of arguments against positions no one has advanced.
If you accept the above then it would make sense to promote certain races with preferable behaviors over races with non-preferable behaviors
So we should promote Asians over whites?
I don't need to prove that I am more intelligent than you anyway. I already know that I am.
Every moron thinks that he's smarter than other people. That is part of what makes you a moron. Any man who must say...
It must really burn you up that I didn't support your kween Tulsi. You have been a little bitch ever since.
I don't even remember you. Only when you bring that up do I realize oh right, there's that sad, pathetic guy who loves neocons.
Plenty of people. None of that based on ethnicity. And I'm certainly not pathetic enough to have an obsession with a group of 15 million people.
Top poster being UncleAdolf. Name checks out.
Well, most people here decry that and think that Jews are bad regardless of their belief in the Old Testament, Talmud or anything else.
That's the trick you've fallen for. By thinking people who have a problem with Jews only do so because of a "fake" document that you happen to know is fake but they are all too stupid to know
Realizing that people who "have a problem with Jews" ain't the brightest people in the bunch isn't exactly a trick.
I never considered it because it isn't true
...there's something you should know.
I would put my college transcripts up against yours any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
This is the smarts equivalent of challenging people to a fight online. It's not impressive to make an offer you know no one will take, and that you will retract even if someone would.
That you don't know this is proving, once again, that you...
It leads people to buy potato peelers, the UK police's worst nightmare.
Not a 'hard r', as people put it retardedly, has been treated like the real thing for a while now.
Got it, it's anti-white for a black guy to point out that a white guy got screwed over by the justice system.
if written by non-jews who wished to describe the plot which they believed the jews were enacting without actual primary jewish sources but included the author's beliefs, rational for coming to them and whatever actual factual evidence was presented, then it wouldn't be considered "fake".
Well, even then it would be fake on multiple counts. It purports to be the work of Jews. It is not. So it is fake. And the original work didn't even have anything to do with Jews.
The focus of the Protocols is always whether it's real/fake
No one but you talks about it, let alone focuses on it.
Better than being an idiot
And you never considered you might be both, which is what proves the point.
Why would he assume a Nazi wants to kill him and his family?
He's a Russian colluder.
it is not a proven fact beyond all doubt that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is in fact fake
It's funny that you imagine that you think for yourself while falling for the most transparent frauds imaginable.
If it's truly fake then you'll have no difficulty proving it is
Yeah, except that people post it despite knowing full well that it is fake. Goebbels is a great example. The guy wasn't stupid, but he knew that a lot of Nazis were.
Then I will. Him accusing me of wanting to kill him and his family and laugh about it only makes sense if he is a jew.
Because you're a Nazi?
No, we can't fucking help you, you entitled bastard, but if your arm is that important to your subjective well-being, we can kill you if you want.
We live in hell.
I'll go way out on a limb and assume that you don't have receipts for that, beyond that your inbred ass doesn't like them.