71
Comments (22)
sorted by:
40
dunmer_say_the_nword 40 points ago +40 / -0

We're seeing double speak happen in real time, and can document it

15
Gizortnik 15 points ago +15 / -0

and can document it

... for now

10
TentElephant 10 points ago +10 / -0

Someone out there is eagerly waiting for permission to unplug the archives.

Spez: probably the glow nigger Coraline Ada Ehmke.

6
w-duranty6489 6 points ago +6 / -0

Didn't that retard Chuck Wendig accidentally the Internet Archive by suing it to get $$$ for his books.

4
TentElephant 4 points ago +4 / -0

I didn't realize that was his doing.

36
4fqi0 [S] 36 points ago +36 / -0

September 1st link - https://web.archive.org/web/20200901141508/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/preference

October 13th link - https://web.archive.org/web/20201014032220/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/preference

As you can see from the second link, they changed it today (or yesterday depending on your time zone) directly in response to the ACB Supreme Court nomination hearing.

24
Steampunk_Moustache 24 points ago +24 / -0

Offensive

...What in the world?

Also, friendly reminder that 'Sexual Orientation' was coined by Dr. Money, a man who viewed sex with 9 year olds as acceptable drove two twin brothers to suicide after trying to brainwash one of them into believing they were a girl. Among his methods in this process; making him adopt submissive poses and instructing his brother to pretend to fuck him.

19
Knife-TotingRat 19 points ago +19 / -0

To indiscriminate sluts, the idea of anyone having preferences is offensive, period.

One of Man's major drawbacks is that it doesn't have sexual "seasons" like sane mammals do. A couple of weeks or so of sexual ramadan to get the nonsense out and then not think about sex for the rest of the year would probably do a sapient species well.

12
Adamrises 12 points ago +12 / -0

As an indiscriminate slut, I don't find it offensive. Mostly because I have my own preferences but will still eat from a pig trough because my dick disgusts even me.

This is offensive to the gays, because it implies that people can choose when it comes to sexuality demolishing their binary "born this way" foundation. It is also offensive to trannies because its the argument used to reject them for sex while still being "a good ally", such as MTF trying to bang feminist lesbians.

I imagine the tranny anger is the big push behind this, like most things in 2020.

13
youtube_admin 13 points ago +13 / -0

I love the trannies. They treat feminists the way feminists treat men.

"Don't want to have sex with me, just because I'm 4'9, 320lb.? Misogynist!"

"Don't want to have sex with me, just because I have a female-penis? Transphobe!"

It's fucking hilarious.

14
ramzaruglia 14 points ago +14 / -0

Changing the definition of the word preference just when a Democrat senator used it as a pejorative against Amy Coney Barret when she used it as a defense about her being smothered with loaded questions about gay marriage.

Same sex marriage was a mistake.

11
almond_activator 11 points ago +11 / -0

Same sex marriage was a mistake.

Giving the gays token acceptance gave the faggots the unfortunate idea that it was safe to leave the closet.

12
acp_k2win 12 points ago +12 / -0

And that led to World War T and the rampant faggorty we are facing today.

13
something_stylish 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's always been shit, let me know when OED does it.

10
DomitiusOfMassilia 10 points ago +11 / -1

Seriously, does anyone have any previous sources to "Sexual Orientation" being offensive outside of Senator Hirono?

I feel like this would have been stupid enough that someone on the Anti-SJ side would have picked this up. It really does look like this claim was purely invented from a single Senator.

12
RoulerBleu 12 points ago +12 / -0

According to Grindr, it is offensive and unacceptable to have sexual preferences, so they removed the user's option to filter by ethnicity.

Clown fucking world, litterally.

3
DomitiusOfMassilia 3 points ago +4 / -1

... But... if sexual preferences are bad, why is wrong to prefer gay men?

10
coke501 10 points ago +10 / -0

(almost) everyone has sexual preferences. So, everyone is offensive. So, no one is. Good.

7
Daucus9 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can this at least shut the "suck my feminine dick/fuck my manly vagina" trannies because sexuality is not a matter of preference, but an orientation inherently incompatible with them?

It's not like preferring Coke to Pepsi. Having a male body is dealbreaker for me, no matter how it's dressed up.

4
mharmless 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, you don't get it. Everything they want or like is just and right and needs legal protection. Everything you want or like is evil, wrong, and needs to be legally stomped out.

Put your mask back on and shut the fuck up, you fucking cishet white male bigot!

6
mharmless 6 points ago +6 / -0

If referring to homosexuality as a "sexual preference" is offensive now, guess I might as well go back to calling em faggots and dykes. Shorter, easier to remember.

2
NeoTokyo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should just label the entire dictionary as offensive