Bar Sargon, most of the skeptics ended up being weak losers. This is why I don't tolerate the moderate left either. They are just like the far left in that they don't actually believe in ideological freedom, the only difference is that they have a wider scope of what can be discussed; they still have a cut off point like the far left. There was a thread on ShitPoliticsSays recently that truly highlighted this point. The thread was about posters from the Tucker Carlson sub talking about women having voting rights. The thread was full of people using terms like incel, misogynist, and even some screams about Nazism. These people completely morph into the far left when anyone goes beyond "accepted thought". This applies just as equally to the moderate right as the moderate left, but I'd argue that the "moderate right" are just a bunch of leftists anyway.
A pretty good way to figure out which skeptics and shitlords still have worthwhile things to say seems to be to ask whether they're still on good terms with Sargon. Not saying he's some kind of genius or always right, but Sargon Derangement Syndrome is real.
The thread was about posters from the Tucker Carlson sub talking about women having voting rights.
From an evolutionary perspective, universal franchise was a mistake. Mammals place such a high value on a female with a functional uterus that they do not suffer the consequences of conquest - in fact, they benefit from genuine conquest, blending their genes with the conquerors. They're a biological fifth column waiting to break off. That's why in every society where they have a voice, they are clamoring for the destruction of all that has been built for their security and convenience.
I guarantee you nobody left on Reddit is posting a hot take with that Scoville rating.
Bar Sargon, most of the skeptics ended up being weak losers. This is why I don't tolerate the moderate left either. They are just like the far left in that they don't actually believe in ideological freedom, the only difference is that they have a wider scope of what can be discussed; they still have a cut off point like the far left. There was a thread on ShitPoliticsSays recently that truly highlighted this point. The thread was about posters from the Tucker Carlson sub talking about women having voting rights. The thread was full of people using terms like incel, misogynist, and even some screams about Nazism. These people completely morph into the far left when anyone goes beyond "accepted thought". This applies just as equally to the moderate right as the moderate left, but I'd argue that the "moderate right" are just a bunch of leftists anyway.
A pretty good way to figure out which skeptics and shitlords still have worthwhile things to say seems to be to ask whether they're still on good terms with Sargon. Not saying he's some kind of genius or always right, but Sargon Derangement Syndrome is real.
From an evolutionary perspective, universal franchise was a mistake. Mammals place such a high value on a female with a functional uterus that they do not suffer the consequences of conquest - in fact, they benefit from genuine conquest, blending their genes with the conquerors. They're a biological fifth column waiting to break off. That's why in every society where they have a voice, they are clamoring for the destruction of all that has been built for their security and convenience.
I guarantee you nobody left on Reddit is posting a hot take with that Scoville rating.