Why do companies do this?
(media.patriots.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
There was a study in the most prestigious medical journal that HCQ didn't help Xi's disease but was retracted when not politically useful anymore. Even real science journals aren't trustworthy.
Us global warming deniers have known that for a decade or more.
If you add more points to your data set and it doesn't change the arithmetic mean or slope of the line, it's tolerable (you can get prettier graphs, at least), but as soon as you add "model-derived estimates" and it changes the outcome, you've polluted your data set and stopped engaging in science.
I don't count climate shit as real science. Anything beyond hurricane forecasting is straight up crystal gazing, and even that is an art.