If I say that if a baseball team won the World Series, and that it must therefore be the New York Yankees, whether or not the Yankees actually win the World Series on a given year is irrelevant to the fact that my argument is fundamentally invalid.
Again, you're demonstrating the problem:
Your logic is flawed, but if the outcome is not what you want, you dismiss it. If the outcome is what you want, it's vindication.
That's not a good assertion either. It could just have easily been a communist, an eco-terrorist, a black supremacist, a pathologized academic, a Chinese agent, or just a genuine lunatic.
Your assertion still doesn't make any sense.
If I say that if a baseball team won the World Series, and that it must therefore be the New York Yankees, whether or not the Yankees actually win the World Series on a given year is irrelevant to the fact that my argument is fundamentally invalid.
Again, you're demonstrating the problem:
Your logic is flawed, but if the outcome is not what you want, you dismiss it. If the outcome is what you want, it's vindication.
You didn't say that, though. You just said:
Which when taken literally, you have to admit is crazy.
That's not a good assertion either. It could just have easily been a communist, an eco-terrorist, a black supremacist, a pathologized academic, a Chinese agent, or just a genuine lunatic.