The New Call of Duty Promotes "fAr-RiGhT"
(web.archive.org)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
This comes off as traditional female whining, but it's under a man's name.
We're not the ones who accepted re-written passages of Mein Kampf.
We're not the ones who have a mass genocide plan that would make the Holocaust look like a day in Chicago.
We're not the ones who constantly "joke" about mass murdering everyone who isn't the same gender as us.
We're not the ones who had a fucking sadistic murderer speak at our party convention.
We're not the ones who have constantly abused every bit of power we ever obtained, putting our agenda in everything from Covid relief bills (Hawaii's feminist economic recovery plan, anyone?) to military budget renewals.
Just fuck you. I could list a thousand quotes from your genocidal cult that justify every bit of hatred you get. Also, if you really are a man and not a woman's pen name, remember that The Future is Female means they'll kill 90% of us. Who's to say you won't be against the wall with the "misogynists" who point this out?
As a publishable scientific result. I donnt think even the author saw it that way. That's arguably even worse.
For those OOTL:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/duped-academic-journal-publishes-rewrite-of-mein-kampf-as-feminist-manifesto/
Here's a quote from the article that gave me the giggles:
-- As it says just before this, what they rewrote was taken from a chapter in which the author describes why his party is needed, and what is expected of good party members ...
Anything right of Mao is far right to these degenerate fucks
Haha. Actual KOTAKU IN ACTION. Nice.
If you look into the article links, Bezmenov's interviewer does apparently say that HIV is not a virus, but the "alt-right" recruitment is completely fake. All this tool has to go on is HIV not being a virus but rather an immunodeficiency caused by drugs in treatment. Literally has nothing to do with anything.
I've still never heard anyone try to challenge Bezmenov's bona fides. I don't give a shit what the interviewer believes: people can be right about one thing while wrong about another, and I don't watch the video to hear the views of the interviewer. I care about two things:
Both should be simple questions to answer. Especially question #2 now that we have the benefit of 30 years' of hindsight, but question #1 as well since the Cold War is over and a lot of those files have been declassified.
The only challenge I got was "Of course he is going to tell a fantastic tale, HE IS A RUSSIAN KGB ASSET" without actually explaining what exactly is wrong with what he said.
They also complain about him going to a right wing think tank. Obviously, a soviet defector should've run to the CPUSA instead. Or something.
GAME DROP!
If only