Tried to archive the actual article but this is what archive.is gives me: http://archive.vn/TQ2wZ

When I saved on Wayback Machine it said it saved but when you go to the link it says "The Wayback Machine has not archived that URL." and gives you the option to save it. When you do it tells you it was just archived and it's too recent to archive again... http://web.archive.org/web/20200822073316/https://www.reddeeradvocate.com/news/troubled-monk-in-red-deer-receives-online-backlash-after-kenney-visit/

But this is the 3rd paragraph in the article and the only example of "online backlash"

“I like your beer quite a bit but your goal of connecting people may have backfired because that photo op is with someone who is hell bent on dividing everyone,” wrote Twitter user @twopennies5.

Even after being in the paper they still only have 16 followers LOL. FYI he lives in Edmonton, a city >1.5 hrs away

Well, did you see the silly article about the "clothing company"? The article itself looks like stealth advertising to me. For some couple who want to start a work-from-home clothing business. :P

https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/lethbridge-clothing-company-accused-of-racism-prompts-public-backlash-1.5074762