Pedos have always been part of it. Sometimes more visibly than others. It's not new.
Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex
It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender
But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
I just dont get it. Aside from casual phone games like Candy Crush, young men are the largest consumers of video games. Why should producers, who want to make money, be expected to shirk the majority of their fan base and cater to a small subset, most of which, dont even play videogames anywyas.
Hasnt it been determined that the LGBTQ population is on average 3%, with the "T" comprising 0.5%? Why would a company willingly restrict themselves to such a small market?
The fuck is the 'J' in JLGBT+?
Juvenile, presumably.
I would have to say Poe's law then - they are not at the point of allowing pedos into the alphabet people club.
Not saying it won't happen, just don't think they're ready yet.
Pedos have always been part of it. Sometimes more visibly than others. It's not new.
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
Their website.
https://jlgbt.com
It stands for "Journalist". https://twitter.com/JournalistEW
I... I... can't absolutely tell if it's all satire. I think it is. I'm reasonably sure. Most of it.
That's hilarious. And most likely satire.
I just dont get it. Aside from casual phone games like Candy Crush, young men are the largest consumers of video games. Why should producers, who want to make money, be expected to shirk the majority of their fan base and cater to a small subset, most of which, dont even play videogames anywyas.
Hasnt it been determined that the LGBTQ population is on average 3%, with the "T" comprising 0.5%? Why would a company willingly restrict themselves to such a small market?