Reactionaryism, from what I've seen, is when you take a set of political views and just blindly oppose them. This leads, usually, to fascism, because it's "diametrically opposed" to marxism, the most cancerous, inhumane ideology of all. In reality, the ideology least related to and most feared by marxists is the principle of Liberty above all, which is why they constantly downplay "libertarians" as walking oxymorons and such, claiming to have destroyed liberty, and the fascist go with it because, well, they oppose "liberty above all".
And so, comically, as the marxists see the growing fascist movement, they become reactionary towards it so as to attract centrists who believe in "live and let live", and thus, when the fascists say gay people are subhuman (in reaction to the supposedly left-wing idea of equal sexual rights), the marxists say they are in fact superhuman, and when the fascists say that black people must be killed (Reacting to the left-wing idea of egalitarianism, conflating it with equality before the law), the marxists retort saying it is in fact white people who must be killed (all the while both groups ignore that in their race war, it is the italians who will win either way)
Hilariously, the groups devolve into bastardized interpretations of themselves and the one-upsmanship extends so far that it becomes a contest of who can prove the people who believe they have redeeming qualities wrong the fastest and hardest, whereby the fascists kick jews out of their circlejerk for being Jewish, and black people flee the marxists as they realize they are being treated as pawns in this larger reactionary bar debate.
That isn't neoreactionism aka dissident right. It is exploring all the unapproved philosophies, a deep pool. The canon starts with Moldbug's Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives and Nick Land's Dark Enlightenment. One of my favorite things to come out of it is the political trichotomy. I'm an anarchist neoreactionary.
Fuck Reactionaryism
All my homies hate depending on a third party for your political opinions
Care to elaborate?
Reactionaryism, from what I've seen, is when you take a set of political views and just blindly oppose them. This leads, usually, to fascism, because it's "diametrically opposed" to marxism, the most cancerous, inhumane ideology of all. In reality, the ideology least related to and most feared by marxists is the principle of Liberty above all, which is why they constantly downplay "libertarians" as walking oxymorons and such, claiming to have destroyed liberty, and the fascist go with it because, well, they oppose "liberty above all".
And so, comically, as the marxists see the growing fascist movement, they become reactionary towards it so as to attract centrists who believe in "live and let live", and thus, when the fascists say gay people are subhuman (in reaction to the supposedly left-wing idea of equal sexual rights), the marxists say they are in fact superhuman, and when the fascists say that black people must be killed (Reacting to the left-wing idea of egalitarianism, conflating it with equality before the law), the marxists retort saying it is in fact white people who must be killed (all the while both groups ignore that in their race war, it is the italians who will win either way)
Hilariously, the groups devolve into bastardized interpretations of themselves and the one-upsmanship extends so far that it becomes a contest of who can prove the people who believe they have redeeming qualities wrong the fastest and hardest, whereby the fascists kick jews out of their circlejerk for being Jewish, and black people flee the marxists as they realize they are being treated as pawns in this larger reactionary bar debate.
That isn't neoreactionism aka dissident right. It is exploring all the unapproved philosophies, a deep pool. The canon starts with Moldbug's Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives and Nick Land's Dark Enlightenment. One of my favorite things to come out of it is the political trichotomy. I'm an anarchist neoreactionary.