Pushing masturbation and gender transforming hormones. Why the hell can't kids be fucking kids? Stop pushing these adult issues in children that have no concept of what is going on, nor should they
Wait until they come up with the argument that it isn't healthy for teenagers to experiment sexually with each other, and it would be better to have adults teach them by literally having sex with them. Then they'll create legislation that allow 'professional sex teachers' of some sort to have sex with minors, and over time adult family members will probably get that right too. Age of consent will also be lowered slowly, at least until it reaches the single digits.
The radical left has no limit when it comes to tolerance, especially sexual tolerance. Nothing is ever too far or too much for them, they'll get behind any shitty argument that seems to hold some truth on the surface. And that tolerance attracts pedos of course, which is why there are so many among the radical left.
I know it sounds like hyperbole right now, but let's talk about it again in 20 years. When acting like a human dog in fetish leather gear in public is called homosexuality, then fucking minors can be called education.
I hate how realistic your comment sounds. In 2015-2016, I would have considered this batshit insane paranoia, and written a response telling you to knock it off and stop making the right look dumb. But here in 2020, this is a realistic argument that i could see someone making unironically in the near future. I want off this planet.
Your first paragraph is as good example of how the concept of the slippery slope fallacy is often overplayed as outright gospel.
If you can lay out the steps from getting from A to B, then B to C, [as you have done here], the larger idea of how to get from A to Z isn't suddenly impossible, meaning it's not a fallacy anymore.
I completely agree. People often think the slippery slope fallacy applies to any statement that A could maybe lead to Z and Z is not the guaranteed outcome. In truth, it's only a fallacy when A cannot lead to Z at all (or at least, Z seems very implausible).
For example (for anyone still unclear about this):
"Developing nuclear weapons will lead to nuclear war" = Slippery slope fallacy. Nuclear war isn't guaranteed to happen just because a nation has nuclear weapons.
"Developing nuclear weapons could lead to nuclear war" = Not a slippery slope fallacy. Nuclear war could indeed happen if someone has nuclear weapons.
Pushing masturbation and gender transforming hormones. Why the hell can't kids be fucking kids? Stop pushing these adult issues in children that have no concept of what is going on, nor should they
Wait until they come up with the argument that it isn't healthy for teenagers to experiment sexually with each other, and it would be better to have adults teach them by literally having sex with them. Then they'll create legislation that allow 'professional sex teachers' of some sort to have sex with minors, and over time adult family members will probably get that right too. Age of consent will also be lowered slowly, at least until it reaches the single digits.
The radical left has no limit when it comes to tolerance, especially sexual tolerance. Nothing is ever too far or too much for them, they'll get behind any shitty argument that seems to hold some truth on the surface. And that tolerance attracts pedos of course, which is why there are so many among the radical left.
I know it sounds like hyperbole right now, but let's talk about it again in 20 years. When acting like a human dog in fetish leather gear in public is called homosexuality, then fucking minors can be called education.
I hate how realistic your comment sounds. In 2015-2016, I would have considered this batshit insane paranoia, and written a response telling you to knock it off and stop making the right look dumb. But here in 2020, this is a realistic argument that i could see someone making unironically in the near future. I want off this planet.
Elon, where is that bloody spaceship?
Oh plz 20 years..... Well be there in 5
Your first paragraph is as good example of how the concept of the slippery slope fallacy is often overplayed as outright gospel.
If you can lay out the steps from getting from A to B, then B to C, [as you have done here], the larger idea of how to get from A to Z isn't suddenly impossible, meaning it's not a fallacy anymore.
I completely agree. People often think the slippery slope fallacy applies to any statement that A could maybe lead to Z and Z is not the guaranteed outcome. In truth, it's only a fallacy when A cannot lead to Z at all (or at least, Z seems very implausible).
For example (for anyone still unclear about this):
"Developing nuclear weapons will lead to nuclear war" = Slippery slope fallacy. Nuclear war isn't guaranteed to happen just because a nation has nuclear weapons.
"Developing nuclear weapons could lead to nuclear war" = Not a slippery slope fallacy. Nuclear war could indeed happen if someone has nuclear weapons.
Tbh at this point I actually think you might have a point, but at the same time, I really don't think things will genuinely get that bad.
So they never have any understanding of anything. Absolutely mindless and easily lead animals.
Kids that won't cooperate will be aborted.