I've created a list of rules as below, they will likely change later, but they are here for the purposes of establishing a base level of social order:
ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity. Also, do not post any manifesto's done by terrorists, active shooters, serial felons rationalizing such things, or promoting such things, even if your content does not endorse the message.
TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.
THREE: Do not threaten, harass, or bully users; and do not encourage others to do so on or off-line; nor make per se defamatory states at users.
FOUR: Do not post ISM. Involuntary Salacious Material means NSFW material of a manner that was not intentionally made public. This is the "upskirt", "revenge porn", and "private intimate photos" rule.
FIVE: Do not post Porn
SIX: Content that contains nudity, pornography, or profanity, which a reasonable viewer may not want to be seen accessing in a public or formal setting such as in a workplace should be tagged as NSFW. Any material of a titillating nature must be marked NSFW.
SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts, individuals who's twitters are less than 500 followers, private/personal information that is not publicly available, addresses, or participate, encourage, or engage in any doxxing campaign.
EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another. This does not apply to satire.
NINE: No person shall use communities.win sites (including kotakuinaction2.win) to solicit, facilitate any transaction, or gift including: ... ATF defined firearms or ammo as defined by the ATF, Bump-stock type devices, Explosives, 3D printing files to produce the aforementioned, controlled substances, Drugs, Alcohol, Tobacco, Stolen goods, Paid services involving physical sexual contact, Personal Information, Falsified Official Documents, Falsified Currency, Fraudulent Services, Pharmaceuticals
TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.
ELEVEN: Do not post spam. If you are self-advertising, you must have sufficiently engaged in the sub prior to your post, and you must engage with the users when they comment in your post. Spam will also include repeated messages and comments that are done with no effort to add to the conversation.
TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes. Yes, the Elders of Zion and other such intentionally fabricated documents fall into this. If your POST is arguably false by the user-base, it may be marked as either misleading or unfounded based on it's factual assertions, particularly in the title.
THIRTEEN: If you have reposted something, it will be removed
FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.
FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users. A list will be provided
SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior, subhuman, inherently morally deficient, biologically/evolutionary mongrel, or participating in a vast conspiracy to take over the world, ala ZOG-NWO / The Patriarchy.
Yes, absolutely. We have built a society that can function relatively well without intelligent people, because we've centralized so much. IQ is even becoming less of factor in socioeconomic success. Intelligence is not a valuable trait in a mate right now.
I don't think I could disagree with you any further. Centralization might have lowered people's aptitude, but IQ is absolutely one of the most important factors in socioeconomic success. Intelligence is now, and always has been, a valuable trait.
There are times and places where it is not the most valuable trait (like in times of war or famine), but it's always near the top because it is inevitably useful.
I'm not saying it's not an important factor, but that it's becoming less important. Something I heard recently, but I can't source it right now. Maybe bullshit, but it stands to logic. There is no real risk of failure in the US. Even our poorest are wealthier than most of the world's inhabitants.
I'd argue accreditation is more important than IQ, and there are a great deal of college educated idiots. Even a person of 100 IQ could accumulate the knowledge to be a successful doctor. They wouldn't pioneer their field, but they could certainly perform the procedures pioneered by others.
What really matters, now that survival isn't a real question, is cultural capital. I think sex selection has become much more about the cultural capital value of the mate, and the arbiters of the cultural value are ever more social and mainstream media, rather than our family and neighbors.
I find that to be bullshit. There's a reason that people are scared of leftist lynchmobs. Without the mobs protection, failure is a real threat. So if you aren't being actively protected, real failure is available to you.
Cultural capital is certainly part of mate selection, but it isn't everything. One of the most valuable things a woman can have is a man who is successful enough for a woman to not need to depend on cultural capital.
That's true. Leftist lynch mobs have really upped the value of cultural capital (and it should be noted that the mob is largely made up of women). Not falling in line does have a real threat of financial and social consequence. As to what women value, I'd have to disagree, as a general rule. Yes, many do value financial stability, but that seems to be an ever decreasing part of the evaluation for an ever greater number. How it elevates them within the mob hierarchy would seem to be replacing that.
Leftists like DoM fear honest talk about race realiam and Judeo-Bolsheviks.