OY VEY, DONT CALL YOURSELF GOYIM YOU FILTHY GENTILE!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Here's my theory.
Christians teach very empathetic ideals and goals, which easily causes self-harm as a group. Not all Christians are good people, I know, but a lot try, even if they fail.
Judaism teaches more in-group beneficial ideals and goals. Nepotism, usury, acceptance of taking advantage of out-groups, us vs them, "we're the chosen," etc.
Christian nations seem like the only nations that allowed them to flourish as a people. If it weren't for Christian nations, I don't think they'd have garnered any real power as a group. Which is kind of ironic, since the same Christian nations outlawed the hatred of them, only to now find Christian nations in the predicament you're asking about.
Anyway, my 2c. I ain't no rocket surgeon, so I could easily be way off the mark.
In the middle ages, Jews thrived in the Islamic world. It was only when they took their masks off and openly declared their intent to seize the ME that Muslims turned against them.
After they were expelled from (Christian) Spain and Portugal, and again after WWII, huge numbers fled to Japan where they've since taken root.
I counter that democracy, unless it's explicitely xenophobic, is inherently weak to Jewish subversion tactics.
Even an ethnoculturally homogenous democracy is weak and easily corrupted/subverted. Plato warned against it as it's just glorified mob rule even at the best of times.
Even if democracy was glorified mob rule, at least only men voted, so it was a decent proxy for the level of violence said mob would commit based on their votes if they didn't get their way.
Today, in Our Democracy™ where foids vote, it's not even good at that.
This is the reason the term "christcuck" exists. It's an ideology of cuckery and subservience.
Tell it to the Crusaders. Or Vlad Tepes. Or Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain. Or Pope Julius II. Or...
The guys that took 400 years of muslim aggro before finally doing something?
Yeah that’s cucked too.
You were already corrected on this a couple days ago, don't keep bringing up defeated points like a kike. The Byzantines and the Visigoths fought the sandniggers by themselves for 400 years before the Emperor in Constantinople sent a letter asking the Pope for help and the 1st Crusade kicked off.
Your theory is correct.
As much as I despise jeet larpagans, you may have a point. Hadrian and Titus did more about the problem than basically any Christian European leader except maybe Godefroy de Bouillion, or Count Emicho.
What, not even an honorable mention for the Funny Mustache Man?
Nah, they didn't deserve free accommodations with an orchestra and a pool.
You're forgetting the rest of the 109.