First people aren't going to agree with me on my assessment of Jews. That's fine. You hate them, I don't. That has nothing to do with the assessment of Nazis. If Nazis targeted only people who were "too asian" they as an ideology would not change from my perspective.
There's this idea that the nazis were good because they were targeting Jews and Jews = degeneracy and therefore the cause of the nazis were good and anti-degeneracy.
Things pointed to are that a lot of the books being burned were degenerate and many of those books were written by Jews. Yes that's a historical fact.
This doesn't make a prove racial characteristic, only it proves that Jews typically are where power is, but tons of the Jews in the concentration camps were not powerful. And a lot of the degeneracy pushers such as in Weimar were not Jewish either, but were German. The point is where power, and decadence is, degeneracy follows. Few would disagree with that.
Here's a big problem with the trying to wonder if the nazis were actually good that the young right in the post-truth age wrestle with.
First of all, nazis, socialists, russians, communists, these are all European political systems. We, in America had a completely different overton window and thank goodness for that. While Europe was trying to figure out what flavor of socialism to implement, America was enjoying a level of freedom, including in speech, and especially in religion that essentially no European country could fathom. So to try to tie nazism to Americanism and borrow it is foolish. We already were operating on a superior level than all those brands of socialism.
If you want to know what nazi Germany would look like in the modern day or any day, just look at Germany from the fall of Nazi germany to today.
Germans have not changed one bit in authoritarianism. Did they drop nazism in favor of freedom after the fall of the Nazi regime? Nope, they hopped immediately into the GDR the German Democratic Republic that lasted until the 90s. The GDR hardly differed at all from Nazi Germany in terms of a government being who you feared rather than a government fearing its people. In fact, it was so close in behavior that I was confused when I was shown a film portraying the GDR in school growing up, having to be explained that this was not WW2. Everyone telling the Stasi about neighbors and teachers and everything else, I could see no difference from the Gestapo as the Gestapo were alwas portrayed.
Then you'd think, after that falls, Germany would FINALLY be ready for freedom, right?
Well rank the free-est nations in Europe and tell me where you put Germany. Germany, if you post memes or criticize Islam, the police get sent to your door just like in the UK.
If you want to know what Germany would be like if they continued on with Nazism, well I've got good news for you; you already know what it looks like. The only thing that got dropped from Germany's government was concentration camps. In all other ways Germany looks the same as Nazi Germany ever since.
But here's the other real issue I have with "maybe the Nazi's were the good guys"; and it has to do with the post truth thing.
If it were to come about, that we made being a woke leftist utterly unpalpable. That, rightfully so, they look at the transgender movement and abortion promotion as the abomination it is, and those people get expelled from the society, in 100 years, you'd have other post truth people trying to re-evaluate the woke people, sitting from a place not like the place where we sit, where we know EXACTLY how awful they are and playing armchair historian and philosopher and they too will go "well maybe the woke people weren't that bad" and if we could time travel into the future we'd slap them across the face and go, moron, yes, yes they were, you're just going to have to take our word for it.
Just because communists are as bad as the nazis doesn't make the nazis good. It just makes European politics an example of why Europe is a total craphole. It's why in America, the 1980s was seen as a time of optimizim and patriotism, yet ask any Eastern bloc nation what the 1980s was like for them and they'll explain that it was a time of alcoholism and despair.
America is not Europe and nazism is just another example of the numerous examples of the hopelessness that Europe has always been further down the drain than America, and that's because America was a fresh start from Europe. A blank slate. A chance to not have to share in Europe's rot.
To want Nazism over what America had in the 1930s-1950s is to say "I wish America was set back 100 years and was a shared partaker in Europe's desperately bleak systems"
To look at modern day America and conclude it's a piece of crap is absolutely rational. It's also absolutely rational to want it to be different. No sane man wants America to be like it is today. The answer isn't wishing the Nazis won. It's wishing that the Marxism that was still being promoted from places like Soviet countries weren't allowed to take root and fester in America.
1940s/1950s America was and will always be 100 times better than modern America and 100 times better than Nazi Germany as well as every totalitarian version of Germany we've seen to this day. Why would we look to a tricycle as the model (Socialism via Nazi Germany) when we have a Porsche as the model (1940s/1950s America and earlier).
I just want less indians, muslims, and africans being imported, and I am reaching volcanic levels of hatred for ANY race or religion who wants them imported.
I don't hate jews either. It's just Jews seem to almost universally back these policies that bring illiterate savages to my door.
I have no negative thoughts about the average jewish dude struggling like us all, but I am tired of the elite ones being vastly over-represented in just about every facet of modern politics and finance.
Much of the recent hate is the dual citizenship. They appear to be using the west as a piggy bank with no loyalty.
Just wish you could discuss this stuff on any normal forum without being banned.
The "average jewish dude" is making excuses for his tribesmen while making sure White Goyim don't show the same in-group preference by any means available.
I don't disagree. I knew a jew in a previous job, hard labor. Didn't care about being a jew; didn't care about politics. Wasn't offended when called a kike, etc. Friendly guy. Hard to hate a guy like that, even though I know I dealt with a rarity. Obviously, I know a personal anecdote is worthless.
Their tribalism is repugnant. So I have no qualms with jews being expelled as a group. I mean... they got a track record of that, right.
I want the west to belong to my people: the White Christians that built these lands through hard work, sweat, and tears.
I want the same thing you want.
But the thing about Jews is, as it's pointed out, they have an in-group bias. Anyone on this forum would agree it's a bizarre twisted thing that white people don't have an in-group bias.
It's not wrong that Jews have an in-group bias, it's wrong that white people don't have one.
Then you have that Jews are very intelligent, especially in the type of thinking that allows them to excel in academia and arts, and you have a very logical reason why they're "overrepresented".
Complaining that they're over-represented and that this must because an injustice is being done is the same thing the black community does about "the man", "whitey keeping me down".
They assume it's a nefarious plot that white people are more successful than black people. No, we're more successful because of -insert literally 100 reasons-.
Feminists do the same thing, they don't understand why men are more successful. You try to explain it to them and they go "that sounds like patriarchy excusing to me".
For Jews it is logical that they are successful in America in many institutions.
As Thomas Sowell has pointed out, he has never, in anywhere he's travelled in the world found "proportional demographics". He'll find asian countries where the minority asians rule over the majority asians.
He's never found proportional representation anywhere. And that's because people are not blank slates. They have different values, different goals, different intelligence levels.
Just take this aspect with Jews. White people, particularly Christians are encouraged away from the arts. It is considered a godless industry and most Christian parents will discourage Christian children away from it, and for good reason. Better to have your child not corrupted than just assume the child will not succumb to the temptations of the industry.
Jews don't have an aversion to the art, nor do atheist god-hating liberals, so is it any wonder that the arts are not filled with Christians, but with godless people and Jewish people?
If black people cared about acting as much as they cared about sports, you would see an "overrepresentation" of black people in acting (before the forced diversity days) but you don't see that because black people generally don't want to become an actor.
So you're left with gay drama kids who's parents don't care, and Jews who encourage the arts.
So the over representation is natural and logical, not a sinister plot.
And when the zeitgeist of the day was just to make a giant hit that makes everyone money, Hollywood wasn't particularly woke.
Now that the zeitgeist is to preach wokeness, that's what happens, and whoever would be in power when the zeitgeist shifted would have shifted in turn regardless of ethnicity.
What are you even talking about "zeitgeist"? That would refer to a specific embodiment of the general feelings of the population. Wokeness is the exact opposite; a synthetic ideology inserted into our institutions by nefarious outsiders and forced on an unwilling population.
Then you're just arguing semantics. The instant that Whites develop an in-group bias is the instant Whites acknowledge that all jews need to go. You cannot defend the group without identifying the enemy you are defending it from.