It's not common, it's universal. They don't have souls and they're incapable of giving a shit about anything but what they want at this very moment. It's not like they have any more respect for the lives of people outside the womb who inconvenience them. The only reason to allow them to exist at all is for reproduction and giving them free reign to destroy everything isn't necessary for that.
It's not common, it's universal. They don't have souls and they're incapable of giving a shit about anything but what they want at this very moment. It's not like they have any more respect for the lives of people outside the womb who inconvenience them. The only reason to allow them to exist at all is for reproduction and giving them free reign to destroy everything isn't necessary for that.
Schopenhaur was 100% correct about his assessment of women: they have no souls, and thus, no moral agency to do the right thing.
When I was a young lad I used to disagree with that assessment, but that was me being a complete idiot.
Schopenhauer's statements were based on a fact of life that -- at the time -- I had not yet experienced.