Hilarious. You'll spit like a mad dog all day and night and do absolutely everything other than actually substantiate why you hold your position so dogmatically. It's like the 2010s all over again except for tax policy.
Notice how you doing absolutely everything but the very basic thing I asked to continue the conversation? It’s almost like you know you have no argument, you just want to screech cause your fee fees got hurt.
Nice judo reversal there, accusing me of your own misdeeds and shortcomings that you've been engaging in at length.
You're not going to actually explain your reason for your position and I'm not going to be browbeaten into researching and hypothesizing why you might hold the beliefs that you do when you could just spend the three minutes it would take to type it out. This is tactic designed to get me to shut up and go away without you having to actually explain your position in the hopes that I'll just defer to the notion that I simply don't have enough knowledge or expertise required to form my own contrary opinion on the subject. It's a well worn tactic, but it was old back in 2015 and it isn't any more welcome now than it was then.
At this point none of this is about what tax policy should be, it's about preserving ego and not having to engage with a contrary opinion.
I am educating you. I gave you homework, now get at it and get back to me faggot.
Hilarious. You'll spit like a mad dog all day and night and do absolutely everything other than actually substantiate why you hold your position so dogmatically. It's like the 2010s all over again except for tax policy.
Notice how you doing absolutely everything but the very basic thing I asked to continue the conversation? It’s almost like you know you have no argument, you just want to screech cause your fee fees got hurt.
Nice judo reversal there, accusing me of your own misdeeds and shortcomings that you've been engaging in at length.
You're not going to actually explain your reason for your position and I'm not going to be browbeaten into researching and hypothesizing why you might hold the beliefs that you do when you could just spend the three minutes it would take to type it out. This is tactic designed to get me to shut up and go away without you having to actually explain your position in the hopes that I'll just defer to the notion that I simply don't have enough knowledge or expertise required to form my own contrary opinion on the subject. It's a well worn tactic, but it was old back in 2015 and it isn't any more welcome now than it was then.
At this point none of this is about what tax policy should be, it's about preserving ego and not having to engage with a contrary opinion.
“I’m not going to be browbeaten into learning the difference between a VAT and a direct tax”
True nigger mentality.