“Why do you care about the best way to do something” is not a real argument, just admit you’re a butthurt little bitch who can’t think objectively on the issue because your little fee fees demand your ego be placated.
“Why do you care about the best way to do something” is not a real argument
Same amount of money from the same people to the same place. What is the functional improvement that comes from declaring "You owe me X dollars for having property Y, peasant" instead of "You owe me X dollars for reason Z, peasant"?
There is none. That's the point. You're so fixated on the justification for taxation simply must be the sin of owning property that you can't articulate what functional advantage it offers over extracting the exact same resources via a different avenue.
This is just you being a retarded autist who cant fathom alterations to an existing system and becoming irrationally angry that someone opposes your worldview.
Same amount of money from the same people to the same place. What is the functional improvement that comes from declaring "You owe me X dollars for having property Y, peasant" instead of "You owe me X dollars for reason Z, peasant"?
Obtuse oversimplifying. There’s a world of difference between a localized property tax and a localized sales tax. You’re refusing because you absolutely refuse to accept that reality.
There is none. That's the point. You're so fixated on the justification for taxation simply must be the sin of owning property that you can't articulate what functional advantage it offers over extracting the exact same resources via a different avenue.
“Nooo we could make the same doing X differently and it would be the same”
Except you can’t, it’s been shown time and time again. Cute projection though.
This is just you being a retarded autist who cant fathom alterations to an existing system and becoming irrationally angry that someone opposes your worldview
Rightttt. I’m the one angry for saying that property tax is the least disruptive and keep screeching communism. That’s me right?
Obtuse oversimplifying. There’s a world of difference between a localized property tax and a localized sales tax. You’re refusing because you absolutely refuse to accept that reality.
And you refuse to explain how there's any functional difference in favor of dogmatically insisting on the necessity of it being tautologically true as if that's anything other than a tenet of faith.
Why do you care so goddamn much about the source of the money if it's the same amount of money being withdrawn from everyone's pocket?
That’s the argument of a loser.
“Why do you care about the best way to do something” is not a real argument, just admit you’re a butthurt little bitch who can’t think objectively on the issue because your little fee fees demand your ego be placated.
Same amount of money from the same people to the same place. What is the functional improvement that comes from declaring "You owe me X dollars for having property Y, peasant" instead of "You owe me X dollars for reason Z, peasant"?
There is none. That's the point. You're so fixated on the justification for taxation simply must be the sin of owning property that you can't articulate what functional advantage it offers over extracting the exact same resources via a different avenue.
This is just you being a retarded autist who cant fathom alterations to an existing system and becoming irrationally angry that someone opposes your worldview.
Obtuse oversimplifying. There’s a world of difference between a localized property tax and a localized sales tax. You’re refusing because you absolutely refuse to accept that reality.
“Nooo we could make the same doing X differently and it would be the same”
Except you can’t, it’s been shown time and time again. Cute projection though.
Rightttt. I’m the one angry for saying that property tax is the least disruptive and keep screeching communism. That’s me right?
Pull your head out your ass you pathetic faggot.
And you refuse to explain how there's any functional difference in favor of dogmatically insisting on the necessity of it being tautologically true as if that's anything other than a tenet of faith.