I'm never one for "PsyOps" and all that jazz. But this seems like a great way to delegitimise genuine concerns over state oversight into private citizens' daily lives.
The "No Gun Zone" signs only encouraged people with guns to be in those areas where they knew they wouldn't be shot at, this is proposing the "No Gun Zone - think of the BIPOCs!" equivalent and is dancing on the graves of those children and others who were shot by murderous people.
We need what we've always had, less government abusing their apparent position of authority and for people to police themselves for the best part.
Keep the "Intersectionality" away from common sense and we'll all be better off. Adding it will only have some equate it with a losing position and the real loss will be more government snooping into every action taken by innocent people and then finding a way to tax it.
I'm never one for "PsyOps" and all that jazz. But this seems like a great way to delegitimise genuine concerns over state oversight into private citizens' daily lives.
The "No Gun Zone" signs only encouraged people with guns to be in those areas where they knew they wouldn't be shot at, this is proposing the "No Gun Zone - think of the BIPOCs!" equivalent and is dancing on the graves of those children and others who were shot by murderous people.
We need what we've always had, less government abusing their apparent position of authority and for people to police themselves for the best part.
Keep the "Intersectionality" away from common sense and we'll all be better off. Adding it will only have some equate it with a losing position and the real loss will be more government snooping into every action taken by innocent people and then finding a way to tax it.