Our crime problem isn't that we CAN'T stop crime (without mass unconstitutional, I don't care what the SCOTUS says it IS unconstitutional, surveillance) it's that we CHOOSE not to. Almost ALL these criminals that do this shit are either repeat offenders or illegal aliens. If we actually locked up our criminals and gave them harsh sentences that ACTUALLY fit their crimes as well as deported and then keep out ALL illegal aliens (even the "good" ones) we would see crime plummet. We DON'T need a surveillance state to do that.
Our crime problem isn't that we CAN'T stop crime (without mass unconstitutional, I don't care what the SCOTUS says it IS unconstitutional, surveillance) it's that we CHOOSE not to
Our crime problem isn't that we CAN'T stop crime (without mass unconstitutional, I don't care what the SCOTUS says it IS unconstitutional, surveillance) it's that we CHOOSE not to. Almost ALL these criminals that do this shit are either repeat offenders or illegal aliens. If we actually locked up our criminals and gave them harsh sentences that ACTUALLY fit their crimes as well as deported and then keep out ALL illegal aliens (even the "good" ones) we would see crime plummet. We DON'T need a surveillance state to do that.
I'm for the immediate execution of any foreign criminals, yes even for speeding.
For whites I propose a 'three strikes you're dead' for any crime that has a prison sentence. Clearly you won't change or rehabilitate at that point.
No shit.
Who wants to bet these "teens" are out on bail? Or "caught a break" from some liberal judge.
I will not be moved by any technogical argument on stopping crime before we get a judicial argument.
Lock up? Just put a bullet in them
we never had any choice.