US Army Corps of Engineers: Salmon are more important than humans.
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Date Enacted: Dec 28, 1973
huh.. right now? after 53 years?
The people forcing this particular implementation are. Wake up.
Are you being sued? Then how about we fire people, from the top down, until this hairbrained bullshit dies? Give me two weeks and this is no longer an issue anywhere in the country.
What are you some kind of fish lover? Yea. We divert water. It is going to impact the fish. There are other ways of mitigating this other than, you know, DUMPING ALL THE FUCKING WATER.
Genuinely: Nice try; however, this bullshit is indefensible.
You have no idea how this works bud.
The reason its happening now is because someone DID sue them and said they were culpable and breaking the EWA. They proved harm and that then forces the fix. The ACOE doesnt do ANYTHING proactively. They are told what to do, either by admin or by judges.
Then you are dogshit at explaining things.
Cite the lawsuit.
Let me know when you figure out it's not actually called the Endangered Wildlife Act.
Nigger, dozens have sued them. Not least of which is SPAWN. AND there are dozens of endangered wildlife acts both federal and state. The one in California is the one being used currently.
So you have no idea how to communicate complicated ideas. I wonder why you spend so much of your life posting then? Or having spent so much time why are you so dogshit at this?
And you have no idea how to follow complicated ideas. Do you think California state laws control the Army Corps of Engineers actions in Oregon?
Anyways, I think the point is lost on you, so I'll just say: "Have a nice day, Butt oucha 9k."
Yes. Unless a law has a sunset clause or gets overwritten they stay laws forever.
Explain the gap between the law existing and sudden enforcement of it.
That's the point at issue here. Not why laws continue to exist.
Big brain logic there. You can start with the fact that this population of fish wasn't listed as "threatened" until 1999. Then, I'm assuming here, they tried other things before proposing such a drastic course of action. Which resulted in a lawsuit, which is why you only found out about it today. The thing you have to realize is reality exists, is dynamic, and keeps chugging along even when not observed by you.
I say "population" because it's only listed as such in a handful of specific locations. The species itself is not endangered.
I bet you can figure it out.