Ah, so your argument is that since there's so much inefficiency and waste, we can afford to lose 70% of the agricultural workforce, huh. They're just basically there for decoration and we don't actually need them, and we just pay them salaries because, you know, it's fun?
Ah, so your argument is that since there's so much inefficiency and waste, we can afford to lose 70% of the agricultural workforce, huh. They're just basically there for decoration and we don't actually need them, and we just pay them salaries because, you know, it's fun?
They're subsidized by taxes, and used for luxury export. They're not for decoration, they're cash cows for rich people.
You said people would starve. I'm telling you most of the food grown DOESNT FEED US.
So fucking YES 70% of it going away wouldnt starve anybody, because it isnt feeding anybody.