It's been studied. For example, Canada measured drivers' reaction times to unexpected events and found between 1 and up to 5 seconds, with an average of about 2.5. That's not fast enough to be the primary way we do anything.
You can do the trick where somebody drops a measuring stick and measure your reaction time. If you're in a fight with somebody that knows what you're going to do before you do it then 0.2s is nowhere near fast enough.
But it's also common sense; if you can predict what your adversary is going to do and they can't predict then you obviously have a massive advantage. So if we're not built for that then the only reason that would be is because evolution couldn't make it happen. Evolution put a monkey on a rocket so probably figured that one out.
The only thing that's subjective here is how much of our brain is devoted to prediction, but I qualified that as obviously my opinion.
What are you babbling about? Are you actually conscious?
Are you just making shit up because it makes your argument sound good? You do realize you're doing exactly what Dawkins does every day.
It's been studied. For example, Canada measured drivers' reaction times to unexpected events and found between 1 and up to 5 seconds, with an average of about 2.5. That's not fast enough to be the primary way we do anything.
You can do the trick where somebody drops a measuring stick and measure your reaction time. If you're in a fight with somebody that knows what you're going to do before you do it then 0.2s is nowhere near fast enough.
But it's also common sense; if you can predict what your adversary is going to do and they can't predict then you obviously have a massive advantage. So if we're not built for that then the only reason that would be is because evolution couldn't make it happen. Evolution put a monkey on a rocket so probably figured that one out.
The only thing that's subjective here is how much of our brain is devoted to prediction, but I qualified that as obviously my opinion.