Look mate, I'm sorry, but I'm not paid enough in my off time to write the absolute essay I need to unpack, critique, and dissect everything wrong with what you've written here.

What I will tell you, from a processional in the field, is that you fundamentally misunderstand the...aggravatingly named "spooky action at a distance", to about the same level as the average pop-science enjoyer misunderstands the concept of observation.

The only one I'll poke at, because it's quick and easy and I can't help myself, is this one:

All science is based on faith too, eh?

All science is based on evidence. I don't have faith an object will fall towards the earth if I hold it up and release it; I have evidence to identify the natural pattern that this is so. I don't have faith the sun will rise in the morning; I have evidence of the rotation and orbit of the earth and how my specific location upon it turns towards and away from the sun in a cycle. So on and so forth.

Science is the opposite of "trust me bro". It's instead a series of "no, no, hear me out"s coupled with the occasional "huh, that's funny..." when you find something novel.