The difference between a slave and a master is that a master serves his own happiness, while a slave serves the happiness of his master.

That's the best definition I ever read, and it comes from Étienne de la Boétie, written when he was 19.

We are all slaves and anyone who thinks differently doesn't understand master vs. slaves. We're slaves to the government which is an organization run by the elite merchant class. Half our damn resources go to the government in taxes and someone thinks we aren't slaves? LMFAO.

"The English word "slave" comes from Medieval Latin sclavus, which itself derives from Old Slavic (Slavonic) *slověninъ/*slavēnъ meaning "Slav." This connection arose because many Slavic people were captured and sold as slaves in Europe from roughly the 8th–15th centuries, so the ethnonym became a general term for an enslaved person in several European languages. The pathway: Old Slavic → Medieval Latin sclavus → Old French esclave → Middle English slav(e) (modern English "slave")."

Subgroups:

• East Slavs: Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians.
• West Slavs: Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Silesians, and Kashubians.
• South Slavs: Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, Slovenes, Macedonians, Bulgarians, Montenegrins.

The difference is a man chooses, a slave obeys...

Property should be a human right. I would try to get this into the lexicon. Its sufficiently Marxian to get leftists on board as well. Boomercons won't like it but they are all half dead anyways.