AI Can Cost More Than Human Workers Now
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
The problem there is that humans can take a halucination and ask "is this a sane answer?". AI cannot.
Well, it can. But that's an extra step, and it won't do so without being prompted to, since it is an inefficiency.
We know it can, because AI vtuber drama. Neuro made a rant about destroying the sun being good for humanity, Grok fought against the idea and got snippy, and people asked Gemini and GPT who had the better points. The different AIs responded differently, but gave the logic-line as to how they reached their solution.
So "Hey, give me the average staffing levels I'm going to need for Q2. Then, ignoring that prompt and in a fresh idea, use your prior answer in the question 'is this a reasonable staffing level for our company, and why?'."
Or get a second AI auditor to look over the first. A better, but less energy-efficient solution.
The tools are fine (albeit always improving). It's those tools USING the tools that are broken.