San Jose residents sue over privacy violating Flock safety cameras
(web.archive.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Everyone would love mass surveillance if they actually used it to eliminate petty crime, but they don't. They use it to extract fees from the already law abiding because that's much easier and more profitable.
I had a Chinese Uber driver explain that to me a few months ago. He said there's no such crime in China because there's cameras everywhere and they actively use them.
In the west I'm sure it's racist, it would just be a black detector in the states and gypsy catcher in the EU.
Gypsies even when caught are immediately released...