Food for thought
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
I dunno, some official statement from the show's production team outlining their reasons for canceling it?
You seem to be laboring under the misconception that I give a shit one way or the other about this specific topic when what I'm actually taking issue with the is the dismissive attitude and dogshit methodology. People can and do just make shit up on the internet so maybe come to the table with even the most perfunctory scrap of a reason to believe any sort of claim you're going to put out there, likewise when refuting a bullshit claim. If you give me no reason to believe you(the generic you, not you specifically), then I'm going to assume you're a bad actor trying to manipulate people either for nefarious purposes or because it amuses you.
You once refused to look things up for yourself, someone outright handed it to you, AND YOU STILL WOULDN'T BELIEVE IT.
YOU are the lazy one.
You want an official statement from NBC saying "yeah we cancelled it because we don't want to see more pedos get prosecuted"?
I thought the assertion was they canned it on account of "we broadcast a guy killing himself live on air and that was too hot of a potato for us."
Ok so you don't doubt anything else besides "the last straw" claim, and you'd need an official statement from the show runners in order to believe it. Is that accurate?
No and you're not engaging in good faith so I should just tell you to fuck off and be done with it but instead I am going to lay this out as simply as I can on the off chance that you're simply retarded.
Twitter post said TV show got canceled because [Insert reason here].
realsolidsnakeoil said that no evidence was presented and that people make shit up all the time, both of which are true.
Someone then countered with "I don't have to present evidence because because it might exist somewhere on the internet."
I said that's bullshit because there's still no evidence of anything one way or the other on the table.
Then you came in and were an emotional sperg because you think things should be believed solely on the basis of them being an emotionally charged assertions.
If you want to be believed you need more than an assertion, and yelling and screaming that the evidence exists somewhere else does not constitute the presentation of evidence.
God I spent way too much time trying to structure that coherently for you and it's all just going to bounce right off you, isn't it?