I'm saying that there's no logical consistency between viewing your dog as a valued partner and then firing it like a missile into a potentially deadly situation.
If the dog wasn't there their human partner would be sent in. And if their human partner got stabbed and killed they'd also be upset.
There's no inconsistency, they're going to send somebody after the criminal. First one in is the one that does it for the love of the kill, whether dog or roided up human.
I'm saying that there's no logical consistency between viewing your dog as a valued partner and then firing it like a missile into a potentially deadly situation.
If the dog wasn't there their human partner would be sent in. And if their human partner got stabbed and killed they'd also be upset.
There's no inconsistency, they're going to send somebody after the criminal. First one in is the one that does it for the love of the kill, whether dog or roided up human.