Such optimism. You overestimate people. Someone did a study to look at how frequently PrEP is even discussed.
At the within level (time-varying factors), participants were more likely to ask partners about PrEP during time periods where they reported more male sexual partners, AOR = 2.89 (0.68), p < .001, and engagement in group or party sex, AOR = 1.99 (0.43), p = .001.
"Twice as likely to discuss it before an orgy." They see it as a magic shield for maximum-risk behavior. They are absolutely doing it. Of course the statistics also showed Blacks cared less about prevention. The authors of the study blamed racism for this, so you know the study has a woke bias and isn't overstating the terrible decisions being made by gays.
Those aren't strangers then. You can easily surmise that they've probably participated in orgy's before and are likely to have the disease.
You're using a very narrow and specific set of data and then trying to make inferences about the general population. You've not even considered something as basic as "what percentage of the overall population participate on orgy's?" It that's less than 1% then all your research is worthless when it comes to the claim you're making.
You make an odd claim that a drug aimed at preventing HIV infection is used by people who are trying to contract HIV.
I say that makes no sense and it's used by people who engage in high-risk behaviors to escape accountability.
You say no one is doing that.
I say that people are indeed doing that. Admittedly a study about discussion isn't the most solid proof, but if you think they aren't engaging in degenerate high-risk activities, your head is buried in the sand.
You respond by claiming that anonymous sex isn't a thing and everyone involved in that kind of thing isn't a stranger? Then try to deflect by saying that most people don't participate in orgies. Even though you know this whole conversation is in the context of PrEP users.
I make fun of you being retarded.
You drop a non-sequitur that most people don't use PrEP. Even though you know this whole conversation is in the context of PrEP users.
Why are you so hellbent on trying to claim that these drugs aren't being used by promiscuous gays to avoid HIV?
What point are you even trying to make? That fags have a complicated and surprising morality?
I'm making the opposite of that point. You're just illiterate.
Such optimism. You overestimate people. Someone did a study to look at how frequently PrEP is even discussed.
"Twice as likely to discuss it before an orgy." They see it as a magic shield for maximum-risk behavior. They are absolutely doing it. Of course the statistics also showed Blacks cared less about prevention. The authors of the study blamed racism for this, so you know the study has a woke bias and isn't overstating the terrible decisions being made by gays.
Not statistically relevant.
discuss it.
Those aren't strangers then. You can easily surmise that they've probably participated in orgy's before and are likely to have the disease.
You're using a very narrow and specific set of data and then trying to make inferences about the general population. You've not even considered something as basic as "what percentage of the overall population participate on orgy's?" It that's less than 1% then all your research is worthless when it comes to the claim you're making.
Okay. You got me. You win. Obviously HIV prevention drugs are primarily being used by monogamous straight people in long-term committed relationships.
You're like really attached to this binary for some reason.
The overwhelming majority of people don't use them at all.
What point are you even trying to make? That fags have a complicated and surprising morality? Jesus..
A retrospective of this conversation:
Why are you so hellbent on trying to claim that these drugs aren't being used by promiscuous gays to avoid HIV?
I'm making the opposite of that point. You're just illiterate.