Happened upon this one recently:
https://x.com/MoreBirths/status/2026093209172992040
This study backs up several chud incel beliefs, most notably:
-
Men who make more money are more likely to attract women and, subsequently, more likely to have children (or get baby trapped)
-
Women who make more money have higher self-imposed standards, making finding a mate more difficult (plus they only spend on themselves)
Therefore: "fixing the economy" will not meaningfully increase births unless women are excluded from any direct improvements.
Put another way: the only way to fix birthrates is to discourage female participation in education and the workforce. That's why dirt poor religious third worlders are having loads of children and socially progressive peoples of all economic levels are having none.
There is no reality in which women spend 80% of their fertility window actively not having children and birthrates do not collapse.
Edit to complete my thought: feminism only increases "freedom" for girls and women for a limited number of generations before collapsing the birthrate. At that point, the total number of "free" girls and women declines towards zero - because only "oppressive patriarchies" are generating children.
Embracing feminism is tantamount to consuming the seed corn. Women are choosing a few generations of fun over the survival of their own peoples, cultures, and species.
Yes. The feminism genie is never going back in the bottle.
Not true, it's simply a matter of helping women see reality (a herculean task, but I digress).
By every metric (self-reporting, mental health, suicide etc) women are less happy today than before the sexual revolution. Even they know it, but they've been convinced that it's somehow because they're being "oppressed by men", even though men have less control over women than they ever did.
It is in the interest of women, at least as much as men, for them to commit to pair-bonding relationships and abandon financial responsibility.