It is, but I'd argue it is because of Christianity. Had Christianity not been adopted by whites, rejected, but adopted by India for instance, whites would have stayed in the druid, viking sort of stage, while India would have advanced and elevated people. Christianity elevates people. Godlessness creates misery.
And the reason white people are on average more attractive is because when you have a prospering society like the west for the past centuries, you can start making more choices with mating.
In survival based societies where the pagan nature keeps it miserable, like India, a lot of breeding comes down to convenience, security, not attraction.
So while I accept the premise that white people are more exceptional in general, I give the credit to the West adopting Christianity and what that does to nations.
And while western nations were exceptional by worldly standards like Greece and Rome compared to the rest of the world before Christianity came, they were also filled with pedophilia and moral degeneracy and that's even when they were at their "peak" not just when they decayed. Egypt used to be the king of the crop in the world once upon a time, but they lost it, so I feel without Christianity, Greek and Rome and the West in general would have devolved into un-exceptionalism very quickly where the nation and people that adopted Christianity would be the most prosperous, most attractive, etc. Because again, when your society is so prosperous, more people can marry with looks being a higher factor.
If Western white countries didn't adopt Christianity and we were still in that struggling stage, white people would probably look a lot different and would be uglier.
Also in that hypothetical, the spiritual powers of the world attack the other nation and ethnic demographics that most accepted Christianity and elevate white people along with any other people that rejected Christianity because it's always been about attacking Christianity
But I see your point. Some large percentages of certain races may be envious and truly would want to throw away their identity to be white. A lot of the behavior seems like jealous behavior. There's no way to know for sure.
I give the credit to the West for adopting Christianity
a) Those who adopt give credit/creed to those giving up for adoption.
b) To adopt (taking for self) tempts one to ignore to adapt (react to change). Few suggest many to adopt by creed/credit to distract from adaptation to origin.
It is, but I'd argue it is because of Christianity. Had Christianity not been adopted by whites, rejected, but adopted by India for instance, whites would have stayed in the druid, viking sort of stage, while India would have advanced and elevated people. Christianity elevates people. Godlessness creates misery.
And the reason white people are on average more attractive is because when you have a prospering society like the west for the past centuries, you can start making more choices with mating.
In survival based societies where the pagan nature keeps it miserable, like India, a lot of breeding comes down to convenience, security, not attraction.
So while I accept the premise that white people are more exceptional in general, I give the credit to the West adopting Christianity and what that does to nations.
And while western nations were exceptional by worldly standards like Greece and Rome compared to the rest of the world before Christianity came, they were also filled with pedophilia and moral degeneracy and that's even when they were at their "peak" not just when they decayed. Egypt used to be the king of the crop in the world once upon a time, but they lost it, so I feel without Christianity, Greek and Rome and the West in general would have devolved into un-exceptionalism very quickly where the nation and people that adopted Christianity would be the most prosperous, most attractive, etc. Because again, when your society is so prosperous, more people can marry with looks being a higher factor.
If Western white countries didn't adopt Christianity and we were still in that struggling stage, white people would probably look a lot different and would be uglier.
Also in that hypothetical, the spiritual powers of the world attack the other nation and ethnic demographics that most accepted Christianity and elevate white people along with any other people that rejected Christianity because it's always been about attacking Christianity
But I see your point. Some large percentages of certain races may be envious and truly would want to throw away their identity to be white. A lot of the behavior seems like jealous behavior. There's no way to know for sure.
a) Those who adopt give credit/creed to those giving up for adoption.
b) To adopt (taking for self) tempts one to ignore to adapt (react to change). Few suggest many to adopt by creed/credit to distract from adaptation to origin.
Cool it with the anti-soapism, dude!
Explain?
Anti Semtic AntiSeptic AntiSoapic