They had a strategy of flying-under-radar that was remarkably successful, and put them in soft-to-hard control over just about everything except China and insignificant pockets of savages in the Middle East. All they had to do was keep reaping rewards, governing with a light touch, and don't get caught, and the gravy train has no end in sight.
And this
The jewish dominance can only exist under continued optics of defense. By their own actions, it's looking less and less, hourly, like defense, and more like power-mongering.
Is this not a statement of the viewpoint of Jewish control of the world?
My statements were a rebuttal of at least pre-supposing that this viewpoint is some infallible foregone conclusion.
Ingratiation is what I described. Most obviously, the United States political, social, financial, media, educational, entertainment, arts, and you name it. It's either outright owned, owes all of its financing to (and therefore is behold to) this power-behind-the-throne influence (note I said "control," you called it "dominance," and these are very different things). The United States still for the time being by far the most potent player on the board, this power is considerable--maybe even ultimate.
"The jewish dominance can only exist under continued optics of defence."
That's literally your quote
As far as my belief if the United States is the biggest player aka the main power in terms of countries, yes we are by a longshot.
Is Israel exacting the level of control the anti-Israel people claim they are?
My position is im highly skeptical of how Jews are portrayed as basically illuminati level of control and again when you're dealing with things like the illuminati, it would be by nature mostly hidden and what I'd say is too much is discounted and cherry picked to hold to the view of Jews being these uniquely evil puppet masters.
I've already explained a bit of why I find the arguments are less than rock solid and I'd either be repeating myself or making other points that people would ignore anyways.
The Americans are literally, as we speak, spending billions a day to fight a war that benefits no one but Israel, driving up gas prices, wreaking havoc on their own economy, turning more and more people against the government, and causing terror attacks against themselves and allies, and you question how much control they have?
Writing a lot of words is not the same as intelligence.
I gave enough context for it to be apparent we are not using the same idea of what "dominance" meant here. That one word choice is also the least interesting or important part of what I said, and it provoked you into arguing against a position, supposedly mine, that I didn't actually articulate. You also chose to focus on the word and run with it, abandoning all the sense and meaning of what was said.
This is malignant lawyer behavior. Which, combined with a look-over of what else you've said in this forum, is hardly surprising.
I don't trust anything you say a jot. Your bread is very clearly buttered. I think you misrepresent who you are, and why you're "arguing." You're agenda-driven. It was clear from how you came out of the gate, with a very long screed that had very little to do with my post.
Maybe you're Doing It For Free, but smart money says your palm is greased one way or another.
You said this
They had a strategy of flying-under-radar that was remarkably successful, and put them in soft-to-hard control over just about everything except China and insignificant pockets of savages in the Middle East. All they had to do was keep reaping rewards, governing with a light touch, and don't get caught, and the gravy train has no end in sight.
And this
The jewish dominance can only exist under continued optics of defense. By their own actions, it's looking less and less, hourly, like defense, and more like power-mongering.
Is this not a statement of the viewpoint of Jewish control of the world?
My statements were a rebuttal of at least pre-supposing that this viewpoint is some infallible foregone conclusion.
Ingratiation is what I described. Most obviously, the United States political, social, financial, media, educational, entertainment, arts, and you name it. It's either outright owned, owes all of its financing to (and therefore is behold to) this power-behind-the-throne influence (note I said "control," you called it "dominance," and these are very different things). The United States still for the time being by far the most potent player on the board, this power is considerable--maybe even ultimate.
Is it your position that this is not so?
"The jewish dominance can only exist under continued optics of defence."
That's literally your quote
As far as my belief if the United States is the biggest player aka the main power in terms of countries, yes we are by a longshot.
Is Israel exacting the level of control the anti-Israel people claim they are?
My position is im highly skeptical of how Jews are portrayed as basically illuminati level of control and again when you're dealing with things like the illuminati, it would be by nature mostly hidden and what I'd say is too much is discounted and cherry picked to hold to the view of Jews being these uniquely evil puppet masters.
I've already explained a bit of why I find the arguments are less than rock solid and I'd either be repeating myself or making other points that people would ignore anyways.
The Americans are literally, as we speak, spending billions a day to fight a war that benefits no one but Israel, driving up gas prices, wreaking havoc on their own economy, turning more and more people against the government, and causing terror attacks against themselves and allies, and you question how much control they have?
Writing a lot of words is not the same as intelligence.
I gave enough context for it to be apparent we are not using the same idea of what "dominance" meant here. That one word choice is also the least interesting or important part of what I said, and it provoked you into arguing against a position, supposedly mine, that I didn't actually articulate. You also chose to focus on the word and run with it, abandoning all the sense and meaning of what was said.
This is malignant lawyer behavior. Which, combined with a look-over of what else you've said in this forum, is hardly surprising.
I don't trust anything you say a jot. Your bread is very clearly buttered. I think you misrepresent who you are, and why you're "arguing." You're agenda-driven. It was clear from how you came out of the gate, with a very long screed that had very little to do with my post.
Maybe you're Doing It For Free, but smart money says your palm is greased one way or another.