Normally, people don't bring crap from other threads into random ones,
And you didn't reference anything. You just got mad at an anti-war post.
And yet here you are pointing out an example of someone doing it to you, while doing it yourself.
Yup, and I provided the context. I didn't respond to a random post of yours with a random accusation based on a random comment I didn't bother to name or even reference.
No one but you sperged
RAWWWWR, I'm not SPERGING, I am very CALM. I'm a very stable genius, like your president.
Why do you care so much that I told some faggot he is riding Iran's dick? Even if you think I'm wrong what's it to you?
I don't like warmongering.
What war am I mongering by the way?
Take a wild guess.
You really need to calm down, my man. Sperging ill suits you.
You do realize your post are twice as long as mine, don't you? That indicates that you are sperging more than me. Your the one that keeps insisting that I am a war monger but you have zero proof. Your proof is me calling some dude an Iranian dick rider. That's it. You're the one insisting your opinion is right and you are personally offended at the thought that someone would disagree with you, like so...
Rest assured that I don't appreciate your sperging when you're clearly in the wrong
So what are you disagreeing about, if you're not a warmonger?
The Iranian dick riding. I don't have an opinion about the bombings. But even if the US is wrong, that doesn't make Iran some poor victim. Or that they aren't a bunch of assholes.
if sperging is the excessive use of words to filibuster a conversation, I think the word count would be a good metric
You have 'no opinion' on a war of aggression, launched on false pretenses for a foreign power that has bribed the president? I do think this makes you a neocon.
But even if the US is wrong, that doesn't make Iran some poor victim. Or that they aren't a bunch of assholes.
And I never disputed that.
if sperging is the excessive use of words to filibuster a conversation, I think the word count would be a good metric
Normally, people don't bring crap from other threads into random ones,
And you didn't reference anything. You just got mad at an anti-war post.
Yup, and I provided the context. I didn't respond to a random post of yours with a random accusation based on a random comment I didn't bother to name or even reference.
RAWWWWR, I'm not SPERGING, I am very CALM. I'm a very stable genius, like your president.
I don't like warmongering.
Take a wild guess.
You really need to calm down, my man. Sperging ill suits you.
You do realize your post are twice as long as mine, don't you? That indicates that you are sperging more than me. Your the one that keeps insisting that I am a war monger but you have zero proof. Your proof is me calling some dude an Iranian dick rider. That's it. You're the one insisting your opinion is right and you are personally offended at the thought that someone would disagree with you, like so...
Great measure.
And "your" the one who can't even speak his opinion on this war.
For an anti-war comment.
So what are you disagreeing about, if you're not a warmonger?
The Iranian dick riding. I don't have an opinion about the bombings. But even if the US is wrong, that doesn't make Iran some poor victim. Or that they aren't a bunch of assholes.
if sperging is the excessive use of words to filibuster a conversation, I think the word count would be a good metric
You have 'no opinion' on a war of aggression, launched on false pretenses for a foreign power that has bribed the president? I do think this makes you a neocon.
And I never disputed that.
If.
Then I'm the Spartan.