Seriously? You, of all people, are saying people don't bring up prior shit you said to you regularly?
Rarely actually.
The guy has in multiple post attributed virture to Iran it doesn't possess
Not here, so why are you replying to an anti-war post with that nonsense? And why are you not criticziing all other people who attribute virtues to countries they don't possess?
And you can keep trying to smear me as a neocon all you want
Wow, sensitive. I told you straightforwardly what that was, but you do you.
I haven't called you an Iran dick rider. So it can't be opposing the campaign as the metric for dick riding.
It sure looked like that here. Because... again... you replied to an anti-war comment with that.
Although at this point you are kind of riding hortshort's dick for some reason.
Ah, yes. Just like opposing the Iraq War is "pro-Saddam".
I'll defend anyone who is against this neocon war. Not calling you a neocon, in case you want to take offense at that again.
Oh come on, you're telling me people don't bring up shit you've said before here? I've seen it with my own eyes. But sure be fucking obstinate.
His anti-war comment can actually have pro Iran sentiments in it at the same time. Hmm do you think it's possible to comment on one part of a comment and ignore the rest that doesn't concern you?
Ah, yes. Just like opposing the Iraq War is "pro-Saddam".
How is saying you're riding hortshort's dick even remotely like that?
Oh come on, you're telling me people don't bring up shit you've said before here? I've seen it with my own eyes
Mostly from one very weird guy who spent a lot of time obsessing over me. Also by you, I believe, but that was a 1 time.
Anyway, that's not even the point. You weren't even bringing up anything he said earlier. You responded to a perfectly reasonable post by calling him a dick-rider. So my conclusion that this was a pro-war post was pretty reasonable, to put it mildly. If you had said "well, earlier you said X, so you seem to be" I probably wouldn't even have replied.
His anti-war comment can actually have pro Iran sentiments in it at the same time.
OK, show me. Where?
How is saying you're riding hortshort's dick even remotely like that?
Because opposing lying about someone is not "riding his dick", just like opposing a stupid war isn't being "pro-Saddam". You seem to think that caring about the truth is loving someone, just like people think that opposing stupid wars is loving someone.
Anyway, I like you, but you're getting irrational and stubborn again. I'll talk to you again when you've calmed down, OK, and then I won't bring up this behavior.
Anyway, I like you, but you're getting irrational and stubborn again. I'll talk to you again when you've calmed down, OK, and then I won't bring up this behavior.
Yeah, that sounds like you, you condescending prick.
I tried to be nice multiple times. But you're the quintessential American: if someone is nice to you, you keep hitting him, like you hit Iran. Restraint is a sign of weakness, and it invites attack.
Rest assured that I don't appreciate your sperging when you're clearly in the wrong, and war-mongering.
Maybe you really are a neocon. All your comments about the war are dodges: "I never SAID I support it" (I just do!)
Rarely actually.
Not here, so why are you replying to an anti-war post with that nonsense? And why are you not criticziing all other people who attribute virtues to countries they don't possess?
Wow, sensitive. I told you straightforwardly what that was, but you do you.
It sure looked like that here. Because... again... you replied to an anti-war comment with that.
Ah, yes. Just like opposing the Iraq War is "pro-Saddam".
I'll defend anyone who is against this neocon war. Not calling you a neocon, in case you want to take offense at that again.
Oh come on, you're telling me people don't bring up shit you've said before here? I've seen it with my own eyes. But sure be fucking obstinate.
His anti-war comment can actually have pro Iran sentiments in it at the same time. Hmm do you think it's possible to comment on one part of a comment and ignore the rest that doesn't concern you?
How is saying you're riding hortshort's dick even remotely like that?
Mostly from one very weird guy who spent a lot of time obsessing over me. Also by you, I believe, but that was a 1 time.
Anyway, that's not even the point. You weren't even bringing up anything he said earlier. You responded to a perfectly reasonable post by calling him a dick-rider. So my conclusion that this was a pro-war post was pretty reasonable, to put it mildly. If you had said "well, earlier you said X, so you seem to be" I probably wouldn't even have replied.
OK, show me. Where?
Because opposing lying about someone is not "riding his dick", just like opposing a stupid war isn't being "pro-Saddam". You seem to think that caring about the truth is loving someone, just like people think that opposing stupid wars is loving someone.
Anyway, I like you, but you're getting irrational and stubborn again. I'll talk to you again when you've calmed down, OK, and then I won't bring up this behavior.
Yeah, that sounds like you, you condescending prick.
I tried to be nice multiple times. But you're the quintessential American: if someone is nice to you, you keep hitting him, like you hit Iran. Restraint is a sign of weakness, and it invites attack.
Rest assured that I don't appreciate your sperging when you're clearly in the wrong, and war-mongering.
Maybe you really are a neocon. All your comments about the war are dodges: "I never SAID I support it" (I just do!)