And this is the job for government agencies because.....?
Not to mention that government agencies are the biggest cause of child abuse out there. From handing over kids to unfit parents willingly (family courts are the prime example for that) to actually sex trafficking them to elites for blackmail (every intelligence agency is conducting Epstein businesses). So how about we kick off government far away from any tech so that they cannot fuck this up as well.
The only job of government agencies is enforcing laws, they have no business collecting data and, as described in the tweet, this law would not sanction any additional data collection by the government.
By making this feature law, providers can operate assuming devices have it. With that assumption in place, all arguments for digital ID as a way to protect children become moot.
Not to mention that government agencies are the biggest cause of child abuse out there. From handing over kids to unfit parents willingly (family courts are the prime example for that) to actually sex trafficking them to elites for blackmail (every intelligence agency is conducting Epstein businesses).
No argument from me
So how about we kick off government far away from any tech so that they cannot fuck this up as well.
no doubt they will rewrite it, There is no way they will renege on digital ID. I'm just pointing out how the law as precisely described in the tweet undermines the digital ID agenda.
And this is the job for government agencies because.....?
Not to mention that government agencies are the biggest cause of child abuse out there. From handing over kids to unfit parents willingly (family courts are the prime example for that) to actually sex trafficking them to elites for blackmail (every intelligence agency is conducting Epstein businesses). So how about we kick off government far away from any tech so that they cannot fuck this up as well.
The only job of government agencies is enforcing laws, they have no business collecting data and, as described in the tweet, this law would not sanction any additional data collection by the government.
By making this feature law, providers can operate assuming devices have it. With that assumption in place, all arguments for digital ID as a way to protect children become moot.
No argument from me
no doubt they will rewrite it, There is no way they will renege on digital ID. I'm just pointing out how the law as precisely described in the tweet undermines the digital ID agenda.