Many people are rightly lambasting Pam Bondi for being an idiot and being unable to do anything on Epstein. But her most recent meltdown involving Massie has me rethinking the old conspiracy about the men in black suits.
The classic rumor is that you get elected to an important position (or appointed in this case) and go to DC and pretty soon you have your standard orientation. After that, however, you get sat down by some middle aged men in non-descript black suits that tell you what things are really going to happen, what you can and can’t do and the potential consequences if you don’t follow their “advice”. For the longest time I assumed this was just fake, and real attempts at change were stalled by various unelected bureaucrats, slow processing by clerks, or shot down by uniparty judges, you know the real power in this country.
But with how Pam Bondi looks terrified about the Epstein stuff, I’m starting to believe soon after she got into office the real people running America sent some gentlemen to explain that she will not be, in fact releasing any truly critical Epstein information unless she’d like for her family and friends to end up in a true crime series or have an “unfortunate accident”.
Makes me wonder about the old notion that you need to be a family man to have a successful career in politics. How much of that is just a filter to screen for people who have familial ties that can be used as leverage to force them into compliance.
"Oh we'll let you get elected, because you'll do what we tell to you later when we threaten that family of yours."
That was valid advice for the time it was relevant. That was from back when men worked, women managed the household, we had white picket fences and a dog.
Those people wanted to protect their family and their way of life... So they voted for someone who also displayed they had a family they wanted to protect.
Over the years that became corrupted... Now you political families where the kids are raised to be pawns, to sit on boards, collect thee bribes and be the one doing the illegal shit for you. They don't care to protect their kids, the politicians look to use their own kids and the blackmailers look to exploit your kids.
Well, I mean, it is better to have guys with families than run a higher risk of electing full blown degens and homosexuals. "Husband of one wife" is the best practice criteria for leadership in the Bible.
And yeah of course you can be a demon even if you have a family, but the point being that it's harder to do so. Kind of like how drug laws still serve a purpose even if you can figure out how to buy heroin.
That may be true under normal circumstances, but right now we're dealing with extremely powerful people that are willing to erase a person's entire family for stepping out of line, we need people with nothing to lose who are willing to die to bring them down
I personally think someone who has no ties but actually is proud of our country would be a better pick. The reason why they couldn't get Trump is because he's simply too fucking powerful to take down, and it's pretty obvious the hand of God is guiding him considering how many assassination attempts he's dodged, so we're VERY lucky with him.
Don't think we'll be so lucky with the next guy who continues his legacy.
Are you saying single HUWITE family-less men are the only people who can save this nation - when the only thing they got to lose is their lives so that they can sacrifice it for the good of the US?
No.
That sounds like you're projecting your own ideas onto others.