I disagree with your interpretation of this article. While Robinson does argue that Epstein was not an Israeli patriot or card-carrying member of any intelligence service, he also explicitly states that that merely makes him a deniable asset. You could call the article FUD if you like, but nothing stronger than that.
Epstein was not driven by Zionism or any coherent ideology. He was driven by access, leverage, and self-interest – and attempts to turn his crimes into a vehicle for antisemitism only obscure the truth.
I disagree with your interpretation of this article. While Robinson does argue that Epstein was not an Israeli patriot or card-carrying member of any intelligence service, he also explicitly states that that merely makes him a deniable asset. You could call the article FUD if you like, but nothing stronger than that.
How do you interpret this?