“The game does not state, for example, that questioning mass migration is inherently wrong.”
Of course not. It's all done through insinuation, implication and association like any good nudge unit tactic. To outright state it would undermine it and also remove the level of plausible deniability that let's them say that.
You couldn't even take the neutral option of researching the "facts" the govt was spouting without being punished. They want you to blindly accept your own replacement
Of course not. It's all done through insinuation, implication and association like any good nudge unit tactic. To outright state it would undermine it and also remove the level of plausible deniability that let's them say that.
You couldn't even take the neutral option of researching the "facts" the govt was spouting without being punished. They want you to blindly accept your own replacement
Now they have to explicitely say "It's okay to question mass immigration", lol