The "quality" of the sperm has nothing to do with it's dna payload in any monogamous society. So unless you are competing with Jamal's sloppy seconds, the DNA is just randomly selected from halves of the available chromosomes.
Scientifically illiterate people like you shouldn't be allowed to post here.
You know how I knew you'd be wrong before having done any research on this? Because biology is almost always rational. Everything works the way it does for a reason (usually more than one). If biologists claim the opposite (as they often do) it's almost always because they are ignorant of the reasons. Biologists are taught to be very arrogant and assume that they understand how things work but they hardly ever do. Most biologists can't recognize patterns in nature to save their life so they never grasp basic principles like the one I just explained.
I definitely did. Like this part: "These results confirm that DNA damage, even in prepared sperm, is associated with adverse semen quality." Did you read at all?
Sir, do you understand the difference between SPERM and SEMEN?
Semen quality is just a measure of the volume and mobility of the sperm in it.
Yes, semen containing sperm with damaged DNA would result in either less volume of cells, less activity in the cells, or both. This would lower the quality of the semen.
The "quality" of the sperm has nothing to do with it's dna payload in any monogamous society. So unless you are competing with Jamal's sloppy seconds, the DNA is just randomly selected from halves of the available chromosomes.
Scientifically illiterate people like you shouldn't be allowed to post here.
Wrong: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14647273.2024.2442450
You know how I knew you'd be wrong before having done any research on this? Because biology is almost always rational. Everything works the way it does for a reason (usually more than one). If biologists claim the opposite (as they often do) it's almost always because they are ignorant of the reasons. Biologists are taught to be very arrogant and assume that they understand how things work but they hardly ever do. Most biologists can't recognize patterns in nature to save their life so they never grasp basic principles like the one I just explained.
You didn't even read the abstract of the paper you linked.
I definitely did. Like this part: "These results confirm that DNA damage, even in prepared sperm, is associated with adverse semen quality." Did you read at all?
Sir, do you understand the difference between SPERM and SEMEN?
Semen quality is just a measure of the volume and mobility of the sperm in it.
Yes, semen containing sperm with damaged DNA would result in either less volume of cells, less activity in the cells, or both. This would lower the quality of the semen.