See, me dying won't prove shit to you, since your delusion is about your own mortality.
I know that all that awaits is nothing. You lie to yourself and to others about a jeaven and a hell.
So, if you please, we'd all be best served if you went and killed yourself.
I mean, if we're ever close by and you're willing to pay my fee, I'll speed you on your way, but given our...geographic constraints, shall we say, you're gonna have to be a self starter.
See, me dying won't prove shit to you, since your delusion is about your own mortality.
False, your delusion is about your own mortality.
I know that all that awaits is nothing. You lie to yourself and to others about a jeaven and a hell.
You don’t actually, the only way you could prove that is by dying.
So, if you please, we'd all be best served if you went and killed yourself.
Why? I’m not the one making the claim that death is final.
I mean, if we're ever close by and you're willing to pay my fee, I'll speed you on your way, but given our...geographic constraints, shall we say, you're gonna have to be a self starter. Or self ender, as the case may be.
Again, you made the claim, the onus is on you to prove it.
Nah, there's no onus on me to disprove your hypothesis. YOU make the claim of religion and the assorted bits (a god, a devil, afterlives, magic, etc.), and I'm denying it. The statement "there is nothing after you die" is the standard null hypothesis you test the claim "there is something after you die" against.
As always, the onus of proof rests on the godbotherers and jesus enjoyer, because you're the ones making a claim. And you've never been able to furnish any evidence. Instead, you just keep buying bridges, saying "surely this time it's legitimate. That robed man with the funny hat said 'trust me bro' and everything!"
Nah, there's no onus on me to disprove your hypothesis.
You made the claim. Again I get you’re broken, but at least have some semblance of rationality.
YOU make the claim of religion and the assorted bits (a god, a devil, afterlives, magic, etc.), and I'm denying it. The statement "there is nothing after you die" is the standard null hypothesis you test the claim "there is something after you die" against.
Where did I? I made the counter claim, you made the initial. Do you not know how science works? You said “this is what happens” I said “prove it” so do it pussy.
As always, the onus of proof rests on the godbotherers and jesus enjoyer, because you're the ones making a claim. And you've never been able to furnish any evidence. Instead, you just keep buying bridges, saying "surely this time it's legitimate. That robed man with the funny hat said 'trust me bro' and everything!"
This is hilarious on so many levels considering the “scientific” clam for life is dna and rna magically spawned from nothing and has since then never been recreated in nature.
Me? No sweetheart, you have to prove it to me. The only way to do that is to kill yourself. Prove me wrong!
See, me dying won't prove shit to you, since your delusion is about your own mortality.
I know that all that awaits is nothing. You lie to yourself and to others about a jeaven and a hell.
So, if you please, we'd all be best served if you went and killed yourself.
I mean, if we're ever close by and you're willing to pay my fee, I'll speed you on your way, but given our...geographic constraints, shall we say, you're gonna have to be a self starter.
Or self ender, as the case may be.
False, your delusion is about your own mortality.
You don’t actually, the only way you could prove that is by dying.
Why? I’m not the one making the claim that death is final.
Again, you made the claim, the onus is on you to prove it.
Nah, there's no onus on me to disprove your hypothesis. YOU make the claim of religion and the assorted bits (a god, a devil, afterlives, magic, etc.), and I'm denying it. The statement "there is nothing after you die" is the standard null hypothesis you test the claim "there is something after you die" against.
As always, the onus of proof rests on the godbotherers and jesus enjoyer, because you're the ones making a claim. And you've never been able to furnish any evidence. Instead, you just keep buying bridges, saying "surely this time it's legitimate. That robed man with the funny hat said 'trust me bro' and everything!"
You made the claim. Again I get you’re broken, but at least have some semblance of rationality.
Where did I? I made the counter claim, you made the initial. Do you not know how science works? You said “this is what happens” I said “prove it” so do it pussy.
This is hilarious on so many levels considering the “scientific” clam for life is dna and rna magically spawned from nothing and has since then never been recreated in nature.