People who actually have babies that die young still love their babies and are happy for the time they get to have them. It's better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all, as they say.
If you truly and honestly believe that there is no reason for abortions I urge you to adopt severely disabled orphans who can't live independently and care for them for their entire lives.
Plenty of people have such babies naturally or through adoption and are happy. And even if they weren't happy that wouldn't somehow make the child's life have no value. You sound like you'd be a great merciless dictator though.
People who actually have babies that die young still love their babies and are happy for the time they get to have them. It's better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all, as they say.
That is extremely selfish. Just like people with severe genetic defects deliberately conceiving children despite knowing that their children will have the same defects.
Plenty of people have such babies naturally or through adoption and are happy.
Yes. The Muslim hordes that think incest is the greatest thing ever and produce legions of genetically fucked up children are plenty happy about it.
But hey go ahead, adopt a couple of them.
You sound like you'd be a great merciless dictator though.
I'm simply not selfish and sadistic enough to force human beings to go through life time of immense suffering.
If your dog is suffering without any possibility of getting better you put him to sleep out of compassion and empathy.
How is it selfish to give people a shot at life rather than deciding for them and murdering them? I'm saying even if you don't love them you have to let them live - self interest doesn't come into the equation. The alternative is a slippery slope into the death panel where you have to justify your existence.
Life is an inherent good that is worth living and killing a person is always taking away something good. And it's not our place to decide who gets to live.
How is it selfish to give people a shot at life rather than deciding for them and murdering them?
The alternative is a slippery slope into the death panel where you have to justify your existence.
Come on. Make proper arguments instead of resorting to idiotic shit like this.
And it's not our place to decide who gets to live.
Yes, it is my place to decide whether or not I conceive a child. It is my place to decide whether or not I terminate the pregnancy. It is my place to decide whether or not I'll raise that child and not let it starve to death.
Like I already said. If you truly believe what you're saying put your money where your mouth is and adopt these unwanted children. Build an orphanage. Dedicate your life to it.
Says the one psychologizing about my selfish motivation which doesn't even make sense. The fact is we have observed these kind of slippery slopes many times. It's all in the incentives. Show me the incentive and I show you the outcome.
Yes, it is my place to decide whether or not I conceive a child.
Yes through self-control, not murder.
It is my place to decide whether or not I terminate the pregnancy.
So I guess it's your place to decide whether or not you can kill your two-year old as well?
It is my place to decide whether or not I'll raise that child and not let it starve to death.
Ah, so you are okay with parents starving their children. You really do fit the merciless dictator stereotype. Too bad you missed your chance to rule China during the one child policy.
People who actually have babies that die young still love their babies and are happy for the time they get to have them. It's better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all, as they say.
Plenty of people have such babies naturally or through adoption and are happy. And even if they weren't happy that wouldn't somehow make the child's life have no value. You sound like you'd be a great merciless dictator though.
That is extremely selfish. Just like people with severe genetic defects deliberately conceiving children despite knowing that their children will have the same defects.
Yes. The Muslim hordes that think incest is the greatest thing ever and produce legions of genetically fucked up children are plenty happy about it.
But hey go ahead, adopt a couple of them.
I'm simply not selfish and sadistic enough to force human beings to go through life time of immense suffering.
If your dog is suffering without any possibility of getting better you put him to sleep out of compassion and empathy.
How is it selfish to give people a shot at life rather than deciding for them and murdering them? I'm saying even if you don't love them you have to let them live - self interest doesn't come into the equation. The alternative is a slippery slope into the death panel where you have to justify your existence.
Life is an inherent good that is worth living and killing a person is always taking away something good. And it's not our place to decide who gets to live.
Come on. Make proper arguments instead of resorting to idiotic shit like this.
Yes, it is my place to decide whether or not I conceive a child. It is my place to decide whether or not I terminate the pregnancy. It is my place to decide whether or not I'll raise that child and not let it starve to death.
Like I already said. If you truly believe what you're saying put your money where your mouth is and adopt these unwanted children. Build an orphanage. Dedicate your life to it.
Says the one psychologizing about my selfish motivation which doesn't even make sense. The fact is we have observed these kind of slippery slopes many times. It's all in the incentives. Show me the incentive and I show you the outcome.
Yes through self-control, not murder.
So I guess it's your place to decide whether or not you can kill your two-year old as well?
Ah, so you are okay with parents starving their children. You really do fit the merciless dictator stereotype. Too bad you missed your chance to rule China during the one child policy.
I'm certainly not opposed to this idea.