False. A suicide bomb is not different than a gun, especially under OIC, it still requires activation. You’re now contradicting yourself simply because of your own bias.
A suicide bomb is not different than a gun, especially under OIC
a suicide bomb only requires proximity to put people in danger, while a gun needs to be pointed at someone to be dangerous. I'm going to need a citation as to how OIC changes that.
a suicide bomb only requires proximity to put people in danger, while a gun needs to be pointed at someone to be dangerous.
So guns are fixed and can never ever move directions in an instant? I can 100% assure you that sig 320 was pointed at someone during that altercation, it being in his waistband doesn’t change that. A suicide bomb is only dangerous if it’s armed and activated, neither are required metrics to shoot someone with a suicide vest, in fact the suicide vest doesn’t even have to be real. Again you’re making up things in your head that aren’t actual practice.
suicide bombs are mass killing weapons (hence why proximity in and of itself is dangerous). The only reason to carry a suicide vest is to kill. Pistols are self defense sidearms (hence the need for them to be deliberately deployed and pointed at a target). People carry pistols for self defense all the time, the presence of a pistol does not signal murderous intent.
I can 100% assure you that sig 320 was pointed at someone during that altercation
you mean the sig that was holstered the entire time until it was removed by someone other than Pretti? You are either a retard or arguing in bad faith. Either way there is no point talking to you.
suicide bombs are mass killing weapons (hence why proximity in and of itself is dangerous). The only reason to carry a suicide vest is to kill. Pistols are self defense sidearms (hence the need for them to be deliberately deployed and pointed at a target). People carry pistols for self defense all the time, the presence of a pistol does not signal murderous intent.
Self defense from? Why would a rioter carry a gun? Again you’re twisting yourself into knots to make up conditions that were clearly false, he had no intentions of “self defense” he was an agitator escalating conflict. Who was pretti attempting to defend himself from? Or was he an ARMED AGITATOR who created then escalated conflict?
you mean the sig that was holstered the entire time until it was removed by someone other than Pretti? You are either a retard or arguing in bad faith. Either way there is no point talking to you.
Sig 320s are notorious for misfires. He had a better chance killing somebody being retarded with it back holstered than a suicide bomber who hadn’t armed their vest yet. That’s 100% true.
False. A suicide bomb is not different than a gun, especially under OIC, it still requires activation. You’re now contradicting yourself simply because of your own bias.
a suicide bomb only requires proximity to put people in danger, while a gun needs to be pointed at someone to be dangerous. I'm going to need a citation as to how OIC changes that.
So guns are fixed and can never ever move directions in an instant? I can 100% assure you that sig 320 was pointed at someone during that altercation, it being in his waistband doesn’t change that. A suicide bomb is only dangerous if it’s armed and activated, neither are required metrics to shoot someone with a suicide vest, in fact the suicide vest doesn’t even have to be real. Again you’re making up things in your head that aren’t actual practice.
suicide bombs are mass killing weapons (hence why proximity in and of itself is dangerous). The only reason to carry a suicide vest is to kill. Pistols are self defense sidearms (hence the need for them to be deliberately deployed and pointed at a target). People carry pistols for self defense all the time, the presence of a pistol does not signal murderous intent.
you mean the sig that was holstered the entire time until it was removed by someone other than Pretti? You are either a retard or arguing in bad faith. Either way there is no point talking to you.
Self defense from? Why would a rioter carry a gun? Again you’re twisting yourself into knots to make up conditions that were clearly false, he had no intentions of “self defense” he was an agitator escalating conflict. Who was pretti attempting to defend himself from? Or was he an ARMED AGITATOR who created then escalated conflict?
Sig 320s are notorious for misfires. He had a better chance killing somebody being retarded with it back holstered than a suicide bomber who hadn’t armed their vest yet. That’s 100% true.