You're push-pin "therefore"-ing this to a weird degree. Walsh is published under the DW umbrella. However he's one of the bigger properties, and his content hasn't in any way significantly altered since he started being produced and hosted by DW. I don't have to like anyone else at DW, Shapiro included, to like Walsh. There doesn't seem to be inappropriate editorial standards applied to Walsh, and Walsh even often waddles up to and over the line of what's typically considered "on-message" for Shapiro and/or DW.

This association doesn't mean nothing to me, but it doesn't mean much. And anyway, this is just Walsh, who I only mentioned in passing as an example of another dude who talks about stuff. I don't like YouTube, but it's on their platform that a lot of decent content is still found. Same with any platform. I don't have to like the station overall to like a show on the channel.

This is what I meant several messages ago by saying that I don't care about this picayune bullshit. You were unfair and ignorant about hoe_math--applying standards to him that I find misapplied and weird. You're doing it with Walsh. You might even have a better case with Walsh (though "he's with Shapiro" isn't near good enough), but haven't really made that case either.

So far the common denominator is you. You don't just throw the baby out with the bath-water, you expect me to boycott the company who manufactured the tub. It's impossible to live intelligently and navigate the modern information environment this way.