He knows nothing about geopolitics. He dabs in and out of the kayfabe of domestic politics without saying anything insightful about it that I could ever think of. I don't look to weird internet people for life advice so what he has to say about relationships or whatever is of no interest to me. What's the hook for watching hours and hours of his content?
Has he said anything more on Iran than this? Please tell me that search is just missing stuff.
Why would I--or anyone--give a shit whether or not he's informed about geopolitics? Why would I--or anyone--watch a guy who goes (went) by "hoe math" for some kind of nuanced treatise on geopolitics?
This is truly very strange to me, just a totally oddball assertion. Not every entertainment product out there has to be some kind of one-stop-shop that delivers to you everything you want to hear about.
H_M is this guy. He has a good data-driven analytical mind, and somehow he's managed to pick up a good amount of psychology and social psychology without absorbing the bullshit liberal baggage that almost always comes with that knowledge. 99% of what he does is apply social psychology, some game theory, some theories of personality (like Myers-Briggs, which I think is kind of bullshit, but it can be used as a lens), and basic microeconomics, to explain modern social behavior, with a focus on the modern woman.
Complaining that what he tweeted about Iran is not necessarily the most informed, is like standing in a Burger King screaming "WHERE'S MY FALAFEL!?"
You can't explain behavior without examining the ruling class that shapes it. If you know nothing about geopolitics, you know nothing about the ruling class. His analysis will thus always be wrong.
How is it ridiculous to acknowledge that the ruling class shapes society? Do you think the Civil Rights Acts, for example, haven't affected human behavior?
He knows nothing about geopolitics. He dabs in and out of the kayfabe of domestic politics without saying anything insightful about it that I could ever think of. I don't look to weird internet people for life advice so what he has to say about relationships or whatever is of no interest to me. What's the hook for watching hours and hours of his content?
Has he said anything more on Iran than this? Please tell me that search is just missing stuff.
https://xcancel.com/ItIsHoeMath/search?f=tweets&q=iran&since=&until=&min_faves=
Why would I--or anyone--give a shit whether or not he's informed about geopolitics? Why would I--or anyone--watch a guy who goes (went) by "hoe math" for some kind of nuanced treatise on geopolitics?
This is truly very strange to me, just a totally oddball assertion. Not every entertainment product out there has to be some kind of one-stop-shop that delivers to you everything you want to hear about.
H_M is this guy. He has a good data-driven analytical mind, and somehow he's managed to pick up a good amount of psychology and social psychology without absorbing the bullshit liberal baggage that almost always comes with that knowledge. 99% of what he does is apply social psychology, some game theory, some theories of personality (like Myers-Briggs, which I think is kind of bullshit, but it can be used as a lens), and basic microeconomics, to explain modern social behavior, with a focus on the modern woman.
Complaining that what he tweeted about Iran is not necessarily the most informed, is like standing in a Burger King screaming "WHERE'S MY FALAFEL!?"
You can't explain behavior without examining the ruling class that shapes it. If you know nothing about geopolitics, you know nothing about the ruling class. His analysis will thus always be wrong.
This is the most unfounded, bizarre, ridiculous, and frankly stupid things I've heard/read on the internet today.
So far, but the day is young. You got some funny things rattling around in that there brain-box of yours, yessir.
How is it ridiculous to acknowledge that the ruling class shapes society? Do you think the Civil Rights Acts, for example, haven't affected human behavior?