I hope I'm wrong (and might very well be), but it feels like this shit is getting more and more inevitable.
If not today, likely within the month.
I didn't vote for this. I actually voted against this.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
I never said years. I said "ages." Which is ambiguous. Point is, it's possible that, just like with Venezuela, we have sneaky Iran attacks in the tubes. The admin has clearly wanted this for some time. Considering they clearly wanted both, it's likely at least potential Iran attacks have been planned just as long as the Venezuela attacks, and so are ready to go whenever they pull the trigger.
Honestly, it would be more surprising if we didn't have Iran attacks at the ready, considering the dialogue coming out of the Whitehouse.
I get the impression that they expected the protest gayop to be more successful. It sounds like Iran was better at jamming Starlink than they expected, and that is disrupting the gayop.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2026/01/13/kill-switch-iran-shuts-down-starlink-internet-for-first-time/?streamIndex=0
That said, they might just attack anyway. Key is looking out for carrier movements. If they start moving, expect something pretty big.
It would be impossible that nothing's drawn up. The question is more about what's actually ready. Getting operators in is easier than moving ships and aircraft. We had CIA SAD guys in Afghanistan within 5 days of the 9/11 attacks. But, the navy was so out position that normal air strikes wouldn't be available for over a month.