Good lord but you're acting like the very worst of faux-compassionate, faux-empathetic, hysterical fruits. It's funny that you referred earlier to whether this was good "for us--" I don't recognize any "we" that includes both you and I, because we very clearly have nowhere near the same wants or goals.
This dumb bitch was literally a professional ICE-harasser. She moved to this hotspot specifically for the purpose of doing this, and she had no other job. She was a part of a pseudo-militia built for this exact purpose, and it's likely she was being paid--certainly funded, at least, for this activity.
She was in the process of carrying out this horrible duty when she rightfully got merked. This is what she was for. She was being backed to do exactly this.
You cry, literally cry "pointless cruelty," and I say absolutely nothing here was even close to "cruelty." It is frankly bizarre and not a little bit stupid to try and paint it this way.
I don't think you're stupid. You don't speak like somebody who is stupid. So what's your agenda here, seriously? I don't believe for a fraction of a second that you actually think there's some moral conundrum or "cruelty" or any other emotionally-laden woman-speak you're applying here, so what is it really you're after?
It reeks of reflexive anti-American-authority. If it was anti-authori-tarian-ism, we could have something to talk about. But I don't think it's that at all. This is so extreme and stupid a position you're taking, that the most parsimonious explanation is that you're just sincerely anti-American, even when we're just finally trying to clean up a goddamn domestic mess that's been long overdue for correction.
My position is to stop America from collapsing in on itself. Yours is clearly not that, so with all due respect, you can frankly fuck off with this "we" and "us" bullshit. If you stand in the way of this meagrest correction, you're an antagonist. Cry morals and cruelty all you want, pilpul enemy. I don't believe you, I don't respect you, I am not moved by your pleas and attempts to shame.
Good lord but you're acting like the very worst of faux-compassionate, faux-empathetic, hysterical fruits.
I'm practical. You prefer satisfying your - deranged - emotions over what has practical use. It feels good, to you, to see a leftist get shot and die, so you support it, regardless of it being immoral and counterproductive.
I don't recognize any "we" that includes both you and I,
Who are you again, handshake? Other than someone who doesn't know that 'to include' doesn't go with the nominative?
You cry, literally cry "pointless cruelty," and I say absolutely nothing here was even close to "cruelty.
You're cheering someone's death. You've failed to in any way specify how this makes anything better, whereas I have pointed out to you how this makes things worse.
So what's your agenda here, seriously?
Here? That's a pretty handshakey thing to say.
It reeks of reflexive anti-American-authority.
Ah, sorry, didn't know that I have to only criticize Murican authoratah when someone who is not to your liking is your authority, like you guys criticize drone strikes when Obama is president and then ignore them when it's Trump.
This is so extreme and stupid a position you're taking,
That said, it's laughable how you think that "shooting leftists is bad" is an "extreme" position.
that the most parsimonious explanation is that you're just sincerely anti-American
Yup. Now what?
My position is to stop America from collapsing in on itself.
And you do that by making leftists think that conservatives want them dead? That is a recipe for civil war and collapse, dummy.
I am not moved by your pleas and attempts to shame.
You know, all you had to do was say "Yes" to my suggestion that you're a terminally-online internet arguer, or a faggoty European, and it would've saved you all the trouble of making this horrendous post-salad thing you decided to do. Again.
Good lord but you're acting like the very worst of faux-compassionate, faux-empathetic, hysterical fruits. It's funny that you referred earlier to whether this was good "for us--" I don't recognize any "we" that includes both you and I, because we very clearly have nowhere near the same wants or goals.
This dumb bitch was literally a professional ICE-harasser. She moved to this hotspot specifically for the purpose of doing this, and she had no other job. She was a part of a pseudo-militia built for this exact purpose, and it's likely she was being paid--certainly funded, at least, for this activity.
She was in the process of carrying out this horrible duty when she rightfully got merked. This is what she was for. She was being backed to do exactly this.
You cry, literally cry "pointless cruelty," and I say absolutely nothing here was even close to "cruelty." It is frankly bizarre and not a little bit stupid to try and paint it this way.
I don't think you're stupid. You don't speak like somebody who is stupid. So what's your agenda here, seriously? I don't believe for a fraction of a second that you actually think there's some moral conundrum or "cruelty" or any other emotionally-laden woman-speak you're applying here, so what is it really you're after?
It reeks of reflexive anti-American-authority. If it was anti-authori-tarian-ism, we could have something to talk about. But I don't think it's that at all. This is so extreme and stupid a position you're taking, that the most parsimonious explanation is that you're just sincerely anti-American, even when we're just finally trying to clean up a goddamn domestic mess that's been long overdue for correction.
My position is to stop America from collapsing in on itself. Yours is clearly not that, so with all due respect, you can frankly fuck off with this "we" and "us" bullshit. If you stand in the way of this meagrest correction, you're an antagonist. Cry morals and cruelty all you want, pilpul enemy. I don't believe you, I don't respect you, I am not moved by your pleas and attempts to shame.
I'm practical. You prefer satisfying your - deranged - emotions over what has practical use. It feels good, to you, to see a leftist get shot and die, so you support it, regardless of it being immoral and counterproductive.
Who are you again, handshake? Other than someone who doesn't know that 'to include' doesn't go with the nominative?
You're cheering someone's death. You've failed to in any way specify how this makes anything better, whereas I have pointed out to you how this makes things worse.
Here? That's a pretty handshakey thing to say.
Ah, sorry, didn't know that I have to only criticize Murican authoratah when someone who is not to your liking is your authority, like you guys criticize drone strikes when Obama is president and then ignore them when it's Trump.
That said, it's laughable how you think that "shooting leftists is bad" is an "extreme" position.
Yup. Now what?
And you do that by making leftists think that conservatives want them dead? That is a recipe for civil war and collapse, dummy.
Please do keep your autism in check, sirrah.
You know, all you had to do was say "Yes" to my suggestion that you're a terminally-online internet arguer, or a faggoty European, and it would've saved you all the trouble of making this horrendous post-salad thing you decided to do. Again.
Big mouth, until it comes to actually making arguments for your claims, eh? I accept your surrender.
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok