Your entire argument is that there’s an immigration section at an airport and that somehow makes immigration and refugees the same.
C'mon man, what is this? I told you that refugees are a subset of immigration. You know what that means? English is my third language too, so I empathize if you're bad at it. This means that all refugees are immigrants, but not all immigrants are refugees. The fact that a historical law doesn't use the word doesn't mean that it's not the same concept - people fleeing religious persecution are refugees.
Again, waiting for any legal definition or any law stating refugees as a class before 1951.
I gave it you. You didn't like that you got an example.
You know you’re full of shit at this point and are just yelling into the void because your ego won’t let you admit you’re retarded.
I'm retarded, stoopid and also Hitler. Now address the points. It should not take a brain surgeon to refute retarded, stupid Hitler.
Durrrr look up why they needed a constitutional amendment to give citizenship to former slaves. Why not just make it a law? Pray tell!
It baffles me how you think this makes sense. You think that a treaty to give slaves citizenship would have sufficed instead of a constitutional amendment? It's very stupid.
C'mon man, what is this? I told you that refugees are a subset of immigration. You know what that means? English is my third language too, so I empathize if you're bad at it. This means that all refugees are immigrants, but not all immigrants are refugees. The fact that a historical law doesn't use the word doesn't mean that it's not the same concept - people fleeing religious persecution are refugees.
You’re truly beyond stupid. I repeatedly showed you refugees are not a subset of immigration. Get your head out your ass and find a legal definition that says otherwise.
I gave it you. You didn't like that you got an example
You literally gave nothing. Again immigrants aren’t refugees, granting citizenship to persecuted immigrants is not a refugee status you blithering retard.
I'm retarded, stoopid and also Hitler. Now address the points. It should not take a brain surgeon to refute retarded, stupid Hitler.
Already repeatedly done, your ego is the only thing keeping from saying you’re wrong.
It baffles me how you think this makes sense. You think that a treaty to give slaves citizenship would have sufficed instead of a constitutional amendment? It's very stupid.
Yes, you moron. Learn basic fucking law, you need a legal basis.
I thought we had established that I was retarded, stupid Hitler. Why repeat the obvious?
I repeatedly showed you refugees are not a subset of immigration. Get your head out your ass and find a legal definition that says otherwise.
We're going in circles because you can't admit fault. That's why you have to affirm the craziest statements, like the idea that people fleeing religious persecution are not refugees.
Again immigrants aren’t refugees, granting citizenship to persecuted immigrants is not a refugee status you blithering retard.
That is correct. It doesn't make them not refugees.
Already repeatedly done, your ego is the only thing keeping from saying you’re wrong.
When I'm wrong, I gladly admit it. You do not. Though given your level of delusion, I wonder if you even realize that you're wrong.
Yes, you moron. Learn basic fucking law, you need a legal basis.
No, treaties don't create powers that Congress otherwise doesn't have. This is literal insanity.
We're going in circles because you can't admit fault. That's why you have to affirm the craziest statements, like the idea that people fleeing religious persecution are not refugees.
Refugees are not citizens you blithering retard. How many times to we have to go over this? They granted those people citizenship you absolute moron.
That is correct. It doesn't make them not refugees.
Double negative aside it literally does make them not refugees. Refugees were not defined as a class until 1951 and defined as a temporary status.
No, treaties don't create powers that Congress otherwise doesn't have. This is literal insanity.
When you’re an American citizen and can actually debate the federalist papers instead of just spewing retardation let me know!
C'mon man, what is this? I told you that refugees are a subset of immigration. You know what that means? English is my third language too, so I empathize if you're bad at it. This means that all refugees are immigrants, but not all immigrants are refugees. The fact that a historical law doesn't use the word doesn't mean that it's not the same concept - people fleeing religious persecution are refugees.
I gave it you. You didn't like that you got an example.
I'm retarded, stoopid and also Hitler. Now address the points. It should not take a brain surgeon to refute retarded, stupid Hitler.
It baffles me how you think this makes sense. You think that a treaty to give slaves citizenship would have sufficed instead of a constitutional amendment? It's very stupid.
You’re truly beyond stupid. I repeatedly showed you refugees are not a subset of immigration. Get your head out your ass and find a legal definition that says otherwise.
You literally gave nothing. Again immigrants aren’t refugees, granting citizenship to persecuted immigrants is not a refugee status you blithering retard.
Already repeatedly done, your ego is the only thing keeping from saying you’re wrong.
Yes, you moron. Learn basic fucking law, you need a legal basis.
I thought we had established that I was retarded, stupid Hitler. Why repeat the obvious?
We're going in circles because you can't admit fault. That's why you have to affirm the craziest statements, like the idea that people fleeing religious persecution are not refugees.
That is correct. It doesn't make them not refugees.
When I'm wrong, I gladly admit it. You do not. Though given your level of delusion, I wonder if you even realize that you're wrong.
No, treaties don't create powers that Congress otherwise doesn't have. This is literal insanity.
Refugees are not citizens you blithering retard. How many times to we have to go over this? They granted those people citizenship you absolute moron.
Double negative aside it literally does make them not refugees. Refugees were not defined as a class until 1951 and defined as a temporary status.
When you’re an American citizen and can actually debate the federalist papers instead of just spewing retardation let me know!